> Most states require "imminent threat of death or major bodily injury"
@drenath
@Yussuki ₪
That's got lots of wiggle room for lawyers to argue, but it's precise and specific by US lawyer standards. That language comes from the nearly century old MPC (Model Penal Code lawyer trade group drafted criminal law standards adopted with minor variants in all US states), to distinguish 2nd degree assault (felony) from 3rd Degree Assault (higher level misdemeanor).

Gangs are very rare. Quite inexistent. In Germany and France yea ..but not many.

How do you establish the "major bodily injury"? is it according to the number of days in hospital?

This is how they are set in Europe.. formulation is a bit more clear here

Remember, assault is ability and intent; battery is physical contact, so zero injuries required. Answering such legal questions can turn complex fast, and not be possible to do in advance of specific cases, despite legal standards requiring that.

We only use "intent" here. Ability is non existent in law

And crimes involving physical contact are specifically mentioned one by one..

For example: "Hit that causes death"

"Brawl that leads to 1 person dead"

"Brawl that leads to more than 1 person dead"

If some dementia riddled old person states a threat and shows intent to carry it out, but is grossly lacking in ability to do so, or someone in another country or without a firearm at hand threatens to shoot you, I'd guess your courts do incorporate what in US law is the "ability" provision into whether "intent" seems credible?

"Robbery with violence"

"Robbery without violence"

Ah i see... Here, if a person with dementia intends to kill some1 but is unable to carry out and doesnt carry out, is not punished

His mental disease prevents him from being subject to a penal (criminal) trial

😂

Its racist !!!! because the white is encapsulated into a black square 😂

There isn’t an equal representation of black n white in that meme

It’s whitewashed

How dare you

😂

only the black text has power

Redskins are underrepresentd..only a small heart.

Paradox: Romanians believe that in some some situations, rape can be justified (55% of romanians), yet, at a population of 21 milion ppl, there are 2.5 rapes / day.

Weird indeed 😂

Which is 579% less than in US / 1000 population

re: Roma people: nomadic gypsies and such.... criminals who should be eradicated or contained, or major human rights victims? (I see signs of both, and a major conflict in most Western style real estate laws and practices, with nomadic lifestyles, whether small clusters, or tribal nations that historically were likely to be hunters, and not industrial or farming based.)

Actually Roma population are 4 milion in Europe. IN whole europe, Out of which 2.75 milions live in ROmania

And Europe has 741 milion ppl

We integrated quite well in Romania. Yet some ppl dont like them because they are so noisy and pickpocket

They were victims yes 60 years ago.

Or include factions like in this country, the Irish Travelers, who are a nasty criminal scam group of staged auto accident and construction fraud crooks, who those who've dealt with them generally wish were exterminated as vermin. But others integrate into more normal social function.

How much of Roma peoples in your region still attempt nomadic lifestyles, versus more fixed home based ones more common the last century or more?

Very few gypsies live like nomads today.. I can occasionaly see a family driving a horse carriage.. they are very rare.

In Romania, there are more medieval villages with Romanians living there than nomad gypsy settlements..

With Medieval churches for 4-500 years or more

Is that driven more by economics of industrial society, or population increase making migrant practices difficult?

Hm Due to industrialization, yea. Population of romania is slightly decreasing

Since we joined the EU some of them left for wealthier countries

They come back and forth

Most of them profit from social benefits in Germany or France