Message from @Wardawg_79
Discord ID: 735853083455914034
But that’s irrelevant
You're glad?
Because it was done to me. And I’m sure I’d say the opposite of they didn’t
I just say that because it is what I’m used to
I'm also a victim of it but I can't say that I am glad I am a victim of it
If they wait me to realize how nice is circumcision at my consenting age, That would be harder and uneasy for me
It's relevant
Huh
Because most ones who have circumcised are okay with it
That's not the point, they have no choice but to be ok with it after its been done...
I have choice not to be ok
Actually you don't have control over the way you think about the things you think about
Oh, Peterson army?
You didn't decide to be OK with it you just are because you don't have any other options
I know who Peterson is but I am in no way a member of any type of Peterson army
No, my cock looks nicer than mu friends and mine easier to keep hygiene than other cocks that aren't.
Yes, I have been observing dicks
That's differently a myth, It is not any easier to clean a uncircumcised penises versus a circumcised penises
Definitely a myth
And your subjective opinion that a circumcised penis looks better than an uncircumcised penis is purely your opinion
Aesthetics ought not even be considered.....
It is estimated, however, that hundreds of thousands of women living in Europe have been subjected to genital mutilation and thousands more girls are at risk. Most women and girls originating from countries in which the practice of FGM is widespread live in the following EU countries: Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Spain, Finland, France, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden.
> No, my cock looks nicer than mu friends and mine easier to keep hygiene than other cocks that aren't.
@Stōrm
Have you sat down and compared your penis with your father and your mother as the judge?
Iam hindu and I have natural dick without cutting my foreskin
@Delta, this is not a minimal harm. Entire genital structures like the prepuce, ridged band and frenulum are fully or partially excised in neonatal circ. That is a profound harm. What you’ve been lead to believe is just “a little snip” is just not accurate.
You have no frame of reference for the anatomical significance.
@Carter this discussion should be NSFW it's hard to discuss this without seeing the real consequences
@tom I agree. It is simply too abstract otherwise. Are you aware of the Forefront discord server? Also, would you consider yourself an intactivist?
What do those body pets do besides pleasure, if anything. I’m not discounting that as important I’m just curious
@Delta, the frenulum and ridged band are really there explicitly for specialized erotic sensations. The prepuce is also highly erogenous but it has other functions. It covers the glans keeping it “moist” and in the proper environment for membrane tissue. The penis should be an internal organ most of the time. Think about if your tongue was exposed to the air for a long period of time. The prepuce can also move up and down the glans and shaft and that is the primary way the penis is supposed to be stimulated.
Fair enough
I already agree with u btw.
For anyone that hasn't already seen the speech "Sex and Circumcision", it is a must watch if you're interested in learning more about the history/harms of ritual and routine circumcision. The speaker is Eric Clopper, a Jewish man who was previously employed by Harvard. They fired him after giving he gave the speech despite the fact that they permitted him to conduct it in their own presentation hall.
Check it out here - https://youtu.be/FCuy163srRc
Eric has now filed a lawsuit against Harvard, and you can read about it on his website here -https://www.clopper.com/clopper-v-harvard
A lot of women prefer circumcised penises.
Hitchens Hitchens hitchens!....
Did he appear?
