Message from @wise ape
Discord ID: 751252495485108364
Haven't gotten to try them
I'm extremely grateful for fish in a can😀
they might be GMO
these days
cant trust noone
Canned Sardines are transcendent: another choice between giving a person a fish or teaching a person to fish can now be had in ready-to-be-consumed non-perishable packages.
And then God said let there be beef jerky
And it was good
ćevapi m8
or pita s blitvom
check that out
And then there was tuna packs...
And they were good but not as good has the beef jerky or sardines.
And God rested after eating for he didn't realize he consume too much protein in one sitting
Ya know i wanna try sardines
Sardines actually sounds like a better topic to discuss.
Too salty
Generally I prefer salmon, but you gotta be more careful about the source of them. Sardines not near as much.
Is discord used for other groups other than pangburn? I ask because I thought I heard matt d say go to the discord.
Oh yeah, it's a hige platform
Loads of stuff
What's some good servers?
What's an ape need to do around here for a damn bannana?
Nevermind, I found some.
Fuck yo banana.
Yo
Be gentle
How does one play another a game of chess online?
I figured it out
@Shem the Penman I would agree with you that before completely dismissing the testimony of these women, we would need evidence that they are lying ( not a criminal courtroom ). It seems coincidental, and I tend to try to stray away from looking through a conspiratorial lens as its extremely low-resolution and appeals to our biases. I understand where @m.miller and @T2the2ndpowr are coming from, but i feel your standards for evidence are a bit too high; this is not some extraordinary claim, and altogether rejecting the testimonies smells of epistemological dogma (something held as an established opinion).
I can see that what I have typed can be taken as insulting, but it is all in good faith.
I am moving the conversation here bc im unsure where to have it.
I'm all for talking about it but we don't allow defamation here.
This is exaclty what we are arguing, defamation is defined as " The act of defaming; the wrong of injuring another's reputation without good reason or justification; aspersion."
we are disscusing what we can concider good reason/justification
And coming on and saying someone is a sexual predator without evidence falls into that category.
but im not saying he is a sexual predator
No but that's what the original claim was.
Ok. but this is something else now no?
I'm not sure.
Haa..