A video being colloquial does not negate it from critical analysis of logic. Your free to discard my fallacy of course - I suppose Bulverism comes close to what I'm thinking about. you wanted skeptical feed back, so I did my best to give you mine.

or maybe Appeal to motive is closer. - eh no matter.

also there is in fact a mind-reading fallacy already, at least so claims this webpage http://utminers.utep.edu/omwilliamson/ENGL1311/fallacies.htm - number 74. Seems very close to what I was trying to say.

> This video comment section needs skeptics... please engage @everyone https://youtu.be/ilOmtQO8Z9Y
@ThePangburn There was a comment by subscriber XYZ that noted some verifiable instances where one could conclude that the sexualization of children is taking place. I am curious of how you would respond to him.

What verifiable instances? Remember what I am claiming here..

Do you have a video talking about a solution for pedophilia

Like a video on how you’d want these people to be helped

We did a town hall discussion on it. YouTube.com/pangburn

It’s such a crazy complex issue

It’s so easy to dismiss

Passerby, apply skepticism before you answer please..

Try to steelman what I would say.

To what you are writing now.

Yeah I do understand the claim. "People are not normalizing pedophilia" was the claim. And I understand that the claims don't provide evidence against your claim either. But I was curious what you thought of the events described and if you thought that the sexualization of children was taking place.

Taking place where

In his video?

No in a comment on youtube by XYZ. a reply to the pinned comment.

Show me the evidence of people normalizing sex with children.

No one has provided a shred of evidence.

A child's pageant show is not evidence of that, a ted talks episode is not evidence of that. Apply skepticism.

Would a school system allowing tranny story hour to take place weekly amidst the cry of concerned parents qualify as evidence?

> Would a school system allowing tranny story hour to take place weekly amidst the cry of concerned parents qualify as evidence?
@Deleted User LMAO NOOOO!!

How is that specialization of children

Sexualization

The sexualization of children is the claim I'm making. Never mentioned sex with children

No and I didn’t say that

I said how is that sexualization of children

The example you gave about a transgender story

How is that possibly sexualization of children

They weren't just transgender. They dressed like protitutes would dress.

Give the example of the story. Cause I don’t think anyone knows what story you’re talking about

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjfyJ_km7LrAhXLo54KHRMuDgAQFjABegQIBhAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FDrag_Queen_Story_Hour&usg=AOvVaw22HLFG0K_UQgKjVYamuspW

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CULHGeWVZA

Keep in mind that this is allowed in the Austin school district

😂

Wow

I mean yeah it’s very inappropriate

I think the beginning of the video is a little absurd with the whole grooming your children

I think children are a little more free willed then that to just let one story telling make them go into drag. But then again that’s just a fashion community which is mostly made up of homosexuals. So there’s nothing evil there lol. But I do agree that it is very inappropriate to be shown at a school

But this still isn’t an example of children being sexualized

No this is indoctrination as much as religion is indoctrination