Message from @Tomer

Discord ID: 755280879877881856


2020-09-14 22:04:14 UTC  
2020-09-14 22:05:01 UTC  

How can a perfect being have desire?

2020-09-14 22:13:50 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/733748197574312011/755189594089062541/ZomboMeme_14092020181321.jpg

2020-09-14 22:21:50 UTC  

this is WORD FOR WORD what he said to me yesterday

2020-09-14 22:40:08 UTC  

When ever you get a chance PangBurn try cheching out the Adam Freinded and PSA Sitch show, if you like'em try reaching out to them and get on as guest to there show I would love to see you on there.

2020-09-14 22:57:52 UTC  

@Smoke are u using fitgirl??

2020-09-15 00:09:03 UTC  

@Smoke did you get to listen in on the convo when I was on

2020-09-15 00:37:43 UTC  

Noone claimed anything about free will only freedom of choice

2020-09-15 00:47:04 UTC  

And that is free will

2020-09-15 00:52:24 UTC  

@kalman you don’t have freedom to choose

2020-09-15 00:52:35 UTC  

Either it’s determined or it’s random

2020-09-15 02:15:52 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/733748197574312011/755250506661888060/20200914_221243.jpg

2020-09-15 02:17:56 UTC  

I’d really love to have a chat with any of you about the relationship between truth and corruption. Someone seemed to say that we can dismiss religion because it’s corruptible; but wouldn’t that mean all institutions trying to honor truth are corruptible?

That said, I have a framing on how to define “truth” that I want to explore, if anyone is down. On your channel or mine. I’m small, haven’t used my channel in a long time

2020-09-15 02:32:30 UTC  

@JPMcGlone I'm down for that.

2020-09-15 02:36:42 UTC  

That’d be a really interesting discussion to have, because the fact that all institutions corrupt is an observation that I point out often. I think listening to your ideas and engaging those would be fun, so hit me up

2020-09-15 03:05:56 UTC  

Always a pleasure guys.

2020-09-15 04:07:14 UTC  

i love same harris

2020-09-15 04:12:04 UTC  

@everyone The battlefield was very strategic today. Well done! Tomorrow the GUNS battlefield will be set... Love you all.

2020-09-15 04:12:22 UTC  

Wel now I’m just curious

2020-09-15 04:12:24 UTC  

Well

2020-09-15 04:16:34 UTC  

@ThePangburn i'm here cause Darth Dawkins mentioned you, did you talk to him?

2020-09-15 04:18:46 UTC  

Tom what do u unbox?

2020-09-15 04:19:02 UTC  

I think his box is full of bullshit

2020-09-15 04:20:08 UTC  

Darth Dawkins sycophants never cease to amaze me

2020-09-15 04:20:23 UTC  

What are we debating ?

2020-09-15 04:20:44 UTC  

Sounded like a morality discussion to me the same old same old

2020-09-15 04:23:39 UTC  

Objectivity does not exist at a deeper level. However, even if we suppose it exists, it reffears to "something" that is reductible to an object. And every object has form , thus at least 2 dimensions.

2020-09-15 04:25:03 UTC  

Objectivity means independent of perception (conceptually) but such thing does not exist.

2020-09-15 04:26:34 UTC  

I strongly disagree. Because in an "absolutely objective" universe , no decision is possible.

2020-09-15 04:27:46 UTC  

Decision are derived from consciousness through intentionality. An objective universe (by objective we understand independent of conscious perception) would render decision making imposiible

2020-09-15 04:28:02 UTC  

@everyone Check out the new upload on YOUTUBE! <#733748197574312011>https://youtu.be/Pv_tDhsT-5k

2020-09-15 04:30:40 UTC  

I think the Discussion needs a Moderator or smthing

2020-09-15 04:48:55 UTC  

There is no thing as "needless suffering". Objectively. Although Objectivity does not exist heh? 😄

2020-09-15 04:54:04 UTC  

You refer to objectivity on a single absolute level? Or ar there more levels of objectivity and morality ?

2020-09-15 04:55:04 UTC  

Trying to reach objective morality = Trying to distance yourself from conscious perception as far away as you can.

2020-09-15 04:55:17 UTC  

But that is impossible when you reach a certain point.

2020-09-15 05:01:46 UTC  

The extent of consequences of suffering cant make the difference between needed and needless suff

2020-09-15 05:01:51 UTC  

Or can it?

2020-09-15 05:03:33 UTC  

Needless Suff = Useless suff ?

2020-09-15 05:15:16 UTC  

So if well-being is being assumed to be the moral goal. If that goal is essentially taken on faith, isn’t the whole thing arbitrary?