Message from @Forsaken.Rhoeth
Discord ID: 495382175210930186
https://youtu.be/y9DbaJZ26s4 LIEING UNDER OATH??.
☝
Where can we keep a list of her lies ---- the list is up to three or four, now
1. she's not a psychologist
2. the remodel was for 2008, not 2012
3. boys were not in conversation
4. only one door on Safeway at time she pinpoints
5. no cellphones
6. Kavanaugh didn't do it
7. she says she doesn't remember who drove her home
Rick Hendrickson
6 hrs ·
So Gina Haspel CIA director just contacted Mitch McConnell and President Donald Trump yesterday in regards to Christine Blasey Ford and let them know Christine and her father are CIA and this is a smear op. I should have included this information with my correspondence with the Donald on Sunday evening the 23rd. I thought they all followed CIA movements, why weren't they already aware of this?.
Hammer is going to drop, watch Grassley. Deliberation on Kavanaugh confirmation has been scheduled for Friday in the Dirksen Bldg, room 226 beginning at 9:30.
The timing of the Thursday meeting set up by DNC Attorney was to align with the Cosby sentencing and the fact that Cosby used date rape drugs.
The allegations of Avenatti that his client could speak on date rape drugs and trains of high school boys having sex with intoxicated underage females where Avenatti also alleges were orchestrated by a teenage Kavanaugh. Evidence will soon come out that such parties did occur with Honey Trap Christine spiking the girls drinks with drugs obtained from Dr. Frederick T. Melges, her mentor.
Dr Melges is most likely the reason Christine became head of Stanford University’s CIA Undergraduate Internship Program. Her email is [email protected]
Her husband Russell Biddle Ford, works at a pharmaceutical company that specializes in psychoactive drugs
The more you know LOL
@Forsaken.Rhoeth Thank You for your effort
Hello ya'll!
Me and Xrindahl were going over the upcoming cases on the SC docket for October - we found some possible interesting cases
We split up the cases between us one pdf for each of us - and made a list of summaries - I love team work! 😃
Found the HOG!
1. http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/republic-sudan-v-harrison/ Issue: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit erred by holding – in direct conflict with the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the District of Columbia, 5th and 7th Circuits and in the face of an amicus brief from the United States – that plaintiffs suing a foreign state under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act may serve the foreign state under 28 U.S.C. § 1608(a)(3) by mail addressed and dispatched to the head of the foreign state's ministry of foreign affairs “via” or in “care of” the foreign state's diplomatic mission in the United States, despite U.S. obligations under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations to preserve mission inviolability. CVSG: 05/22/2018.
2. http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/16-1275-BIO.pdf http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/virginia-uranium-inc-v-warren Issue: Issue: Whether the Atomic Energy Act pre-empts a state law that on its face regulates an activity within its jurisdiction (here, uranium mining), but has the purpose and effect of regulating the radiological safety hazards of activities entrusted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (here, the milling of uranium and the management of the resulting tailings). CVSG: 04/09/2018.
3. http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/knick-v-township-scott-pennsylvania/ KNICK V Township of Scott
@Forsaken.Rhoeth nice dig, and ty for sharing!!
Thank y’all both
4. GUNDY V US http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/gundy-v-united-states/ Issue: Issue: Whether the federal Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act’s delegation of authority to the attorney general to issue regulations under 42 U.S.C. § 16913 violates the nondelegation doctrine.
Lmao that’s a SC issue?
Crazy
5. Stokeling v US http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/stokeling-v-united-states/ Issue: Whether a state robbery offense that includes “as an element” the common law requirement of overcoming “victim resistance” is categorically a “violent felony” under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(i), when the offense has been specifically interpreted by state appellate courts to require only slight force to overcome resistance.
You have gained a rank @Forsaken.Rhoeth, you just advanced to 14 . Thanks for all you do Patriot!
You need the URL notthe Image URL
Dan Bongino fired up https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iaHEvXitH14
6. Frank v Gaos
Issue: Whether, or in what circumstances, a cy pres award of class action proceeds that provides no direct relief to class members supports class certification and comports with the requirement that a settlement binding class members must be “fair, reasonable, and adequate.”
http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/frank-v-gaos/
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2018/17-961
-found by Xrindahl
2000 limiton words
letters sorry
yeah