Message from @DarkSlayer
Discord ID: 495392003832545281
Argument preview: Justices to consider enforceability of arbitration agreements for transportation workers
All of this has happened before. All of this will happen again. A business signs contracts with its workers (or its customers, or suppliers, or anybody else for that matter), in which the workers agree that they will resolve any disputes before an arbitrator rather than a court. Employees often do not like arbitration, in part because they worry that the arbitrator will be more favorable to the employer than a court. The lower courts hold the agreements unenforceable (reflecting a longstanding judicial suspicion of a contract premised on the notion that employers prefer to limit judicial scrutiny of their behavior). The Supreme Court grants review and in a closely divided decision holds that the Federal Arbitration Act requires that the disputes be sent to arbitration. It would be easy to predict such a fate for New Prime Inc. v. Oliveira, on the argument calendar for the first Wednesday of the new term. But Oliveira presents some powerful arguments that should give pause. Most obviously, when you look to the actual text of the FAA, you will notice that it does not exempt all transportation “employees.” Rather, it exempts the “contracts of employment” of transportation employees, which is not quite the same thing. The difference might be significant because the term “contracts of employment” was commonly used at the time of the FAA’s adoption (the presidency of Calvin Coolidge) as a general term to describe both contracts with employees and contracts with independent contractors. And so, a textualist, applying the FAA in accordance with the common understanding of the text at the time of its adoption, might be persuaded that the exempted “contracts of employment” include all contracts with transportation workers whether the workers happen to be employees or independent contractors.
{9} Madison v. Alabama http://www.apa.org/about/offices/ogc/amicus/madison.aspx Facts: The petitioner in Madison (Vernon Madison) has been on death row for over 30 years. In that time, he suffered numerous strokes and was diagnosed with vascular neurological disorder, or vascular dementia. As a result, he no longer remembers the offense for which he was sentenced to die, nor his trial or arrest.
brb 20 mins
Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey exposed for ties to Big Pharma abortion pill maker… effort to derail Kavanaugh is plot to protect abortion industry profits – NaturalNews.com
https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-09-20-kavanaugh-accuser-christine-blasey-exposed-for-ties-to-big-pharma-abortion-pill-maker.html
Why are they not telling the dang truth?
{9} http://www.scotusblog.com/2018/05/justices-grant-four-new-cases/ : Virginia Uranium v. Warren, Jam v. International Finance Corp., Royal v. Murphy, Culbertson v. Berryhill, and in addintion: The Supreme Court once again did not act on Azar v. Garza, in which the federal government has asked them to nullify a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that allowed a pregnant teenager to obtain an abortion.
anyone investigated the Feinstein Q car picture???????
i saw this:
Agreed. And Q's recent post of a black car in China with the caption 'Feinstein' is important for two reasons. First... it is clear Feinstein has Q's attention. But that car in the parking lot of Singapore that dropped of the 'last arrival' before the window in the building got blown out is the same car. Feinstein's car was at the building where the 'extraction' happened.
Help Mic set up
Did this guy already tell su what the FBi will find>???
@JonJon very possible. If Rex is right, then that's why the FBI investigation will be fast. They have what they need. Next week looks like it could be lit
You have gained a rank @Hip'n Chips, you just advanced to 4 . Thanks for all you do Patriot!
@Hip'n Chips I cant deal with it all lol. too much drama and nail biting
Hey, @JonJon