Piss on Blumenthal, Liar, rat faced TURD💩

@V77 Hello how are you it's Unbelievable what these people the Demon-Rats did to Judge Brett Kavanaugh his Wife his 2 little girls his Family I cried when he was in Tears

In 2014, Kavanaugh concurred in the judgment when the en banc D.C. Circuit found that the Free Speech Clause did not forbid the government from requiring meatpackers to include a country of origin label on their products.[111][112] In United States Telecom Ass'n v. FCC (2016), Kavanaugh dissented when the en banc circuit refused to rehear a rejected challenge to the net neutrality rule, writing, "Congress did not clearly authorize the FCC to issue the net neutrality rule".[38][113][114]

Fourth Amendment and civil liberties

In No­vem­ber 2010, Ka­vanaugh dis­sented from the de­nial of re­hear­ing en banc after the cir­cuit found that at­tach­ing a Global Po­si­tion­ing Sys­tem track­ing de­vice to a ve­hi­cle vi­o­lated the Fourth Amend­ment to the United States Con­sti­tu­tion.[115][116] The cir­cuit's judg­ment was then af­firmed by the Supreme Court in United States v. Jones (2012).[117] In Feb­ru­ary 2016, Ka­vanaugh dis­sented when the en banc cir­cuit re­fused to re­hear po­lice of­fi­cers' re­jected claims of qual­i­fied im­mu­nity for ar­rest­ing par­ty­go­ers in a va­cant house.[38][118] In Dis­trict of Co­lum­bia v. Wesby (2018), the Supreme Court unan­i­mously re­versed the cir­cuit's judgment.[119]

@Dina ❤️ Demon-rats is right. It’s vile. It Turns my stomach.

His beautiful family.

It’s evil.

Brb

Afk

Communists

Facts of the case
Antoine Jones was arrested on Oct. 24, 2005, for drug possession after police attached a tracker to Jones's Jeep -- without judicial approval -- and used it to follow him for a month. A jury found Jones not guilty on all charges save for conspiracy, on which point jurors hung. District prosecutors, upset at the loss, re-filed a single count of conspiracy against Jones and his business partner, Lawrence Maynard. Jones owned the "Levels" nightclub in the District of Columbia. Jones and Maynard were then convicted, but a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled that the Supreme Court specifically stated in a 1983 case regarding the use of a beeper to track a suspect that the decision could not be used to justify 24-hour surveillance without a warrant.

Watch and listen carefully https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1nUf8YY1oY

In Klayman v. Obama (2015), Kavanaugh concurred when the circuit court denied an en banc rehearing of its decision to vacate a district court order blocking the National Security Agency's warrantless bulk collection of telephony metadata.[120][121] In his concurrence, Kavanaugh wrote that the metadata collection was not a search, and, even if it were, no reasonable suspicion would be required because of the government's special need to prevent terrorist attacks.[122] In Klayman I, the plaintiffs, subscribers of Verizon Wireless, brought suit against the NSA, the Department of Justice, Verizon Communications, President Barack Obama, Eric Holder, the United States Attorney General, and General Keith B. Alexander, the Director of the National Security Agency.[3] The plaintiffs alleged that the government is conducting a "secret and illegal government scheme to intercept vast quantities of domestic telephonic communications" and that the program violates First, Fourth and Fifth Amendment and exceeds statutory authority granted by Section 215.[3] In Klayman II, the plaintiffs sued the same government defendants and in addition, Facebook, Yahoo!, Google, Microsoft, YouTube, AOL, PalTalk, Skype, Sprint, AT&T, Apple again alleging the bulk metadata collection violates the First, Fourth and Fifth Amendment and constitutes divulgence of communication records in violation of Section 2702 of Stored Communications Act.[4]

Oh boy. https://twitter.com/kevboat44/status/1045851005773139969?s=21. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoOia22VsAAbTZR?format=jpg&name=900x900

Check out @TomFitton’s Tweet: https://twitter.com/TomFitton/status/1045850421867270144?s=09

https://twitter.com/_ImperatorRex_/status/1045829913096249344

And this. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoOeno6VYAEA8N0?format=jpg&name=small

fbi already looked at in sept 13th or around that. nothing here

same return story

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEzDHUMgeAs

😱

@woodsracer544 lol the meme

Lol

Law clerk hiring practices and controversy

More than half of Ka­vanaugh's law clerks have been women (25 of 48) and more than a quar­ter have been peo­ple of color (13 of 48).[70] A num­ber of Ka­vanaugh's law clerks are the chil­dren of other judges and high pro­file legal fig­ures, in­clud­ing Clay­ton Kozin­ski (son of for­mer fed­eral Judge Alex Kozin­ski), Porter Wilkin­son (daugh­ter of Judge J. Harvie Wilkin­son III), Philip Alito (son of Jus­tice Samuel Alito), Sophia Chua-Ruben­feld (daugh­ter of Yale Law Pro­fes­sor Amy Chua), and Emily Chertoff (daugh­ter of for­mer DHS Sec­re­tary Michael Chertoff).[139][140]

On Sep­tem­ber 20, 2018, The Guardian re­ported that two promi­nent Yale pro­fes­sors had ad­vised fe­male law stu­dents at Yale that their phys­i­cal at­trac­tive­ness and fem­i­nin­ity could play a role in se­cur­ing a clerk­ship with Ka­vanaugh. Amy Chua re­port­edly stated that fe­male law stu­dents should exude a "model-like" fem­i­nin­ity and "dress out­go­ing" in their job in­ter­view with Ka­vanaugh. Jed Ruben­feld re­port­edly stated that Ka­vanaugh "hires women with a cer­tain look".[141] In a state­ment to The Guardian in re­sponse to the re­port, Chua re­leased a state­ment in which she de­nied the no­tion that Ka­vanaugh's hir­ing was im­pacted by the at­trac­tive­ness of fe­male clerks. She stated, "Judge Ka­vanaugh's first and only lit­mus test in hir­ing has been excellence."[141] Yale Law School Dean Heather Gerken has stated that the al­le­ga­tions re­ported by the Guardian "are of enor­mous con­cern to me and the school", and Yale is cur­rently in­ves­ti­gat­ing the allegations.[142]

https://wiki2.org/en/Brett_Kavanaugh

G'day all Happy Friday 😁 🤗

@woodsracer544👋

https://www.dreshare.com/christine-blasey-ford/

https://www.dailywire.com/news/36471/kavanaughs-friend-mark-judge-says-he-will-paul-bois

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/armed-leftists-call-for-mass-violence-if-brett-kavanaugh-confirmed-to-scotus/

Terrible. https://youtu.be/f5FD5cr2H5A