Message from @Semtex
Discord ID: 495419651816292363
I hate them
š„
Piss on Blumenthal, Liar, rat faced TURDš©
@V77 Hello how are you it's Unbelievable what these people the Demon-Rats did to Judge Brett Kavanaugh his Wife his 2 little girls his Family I cried when he was in Tears
In 2014, Kavanaugh concurred in the judgment when the en banc D.C. Circuit found that the Freeā Speechā Clause did not forbid the government from requiring meatpackers to include a country of origin label on their products.[111][112] In Unitedā Statesā Telecomā Ass'nā v.ā FCCā (2016), Kavanaugh dissented when the en banc circuit refused to rehear a rejected challenge to the netā neutrality rule, writing, "Congress did not clearly authorize the FCC to issue the net neutrality rule".[38][113][114]
Fourth Amendment and civil liberties
In NoĀvemĀber 2010, KaĀvanaugh disĀsented from the deĀnial of reĀhearĀing en banc after the cirĀcuit found that atĀtachĀing a Globalā
PoĀsiĀtionĀingā
SysĀtem trackĀing deĀvice to a veĀhiĀcle viĀoĀlated the Fourthā
AmendĀmentā
toā
theā
Unitedā
Statesā
ConĀstiĀtuĀtion.[115][116] The cirĀcuit's judgĀment was then afĀfirmed by the Supreme Court in Unitedā
Statesā
v.ā
Jones (2012).[117] In FebĀruĀary 2016, KaĀvanaugh disĀsented when the en banc cirĀcuit reĀfused to reĀhear poĀlice ofĀfiĀcers' reĀjected claims of qualĀiĀfiedā
imĀmuĀnity for arĀrestĀing parĀtyĀgoĀers in a vaĀcant house.[38][118] In DisĀtrictā
ofā
CoĀlumĀbiaā
v.ā
Wesby (2018), the Supreme Court unanĀiĀmously reĀversed the cirĀcuit's judgment.[119]
His beautiful family.
Itās evil.
Brb
Afk
Communists
Facts of the case
Antoine Jones was arrested on Oct. 24, 2005, for drug possession after police attached a tracker to Jones's Jeep -- without judicial approval -- and used it to follow him for a month. A jury found Jones not guilty on all charges save for conspiracy, on which point jurors hung. District prosecutors, upset at the loss, re-filed a single count of conspiracy against Jones and his business partner, Lawrence Maynard. Jones owned the "Levels" nightclub in the District of Columbia. Jones and Maynard were then convicted, but a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled that the Supreme Court specifically stated in a 1983 case regarding the use of a beeper to track a suspect that the decision could not be used to justify 24-hour surveillance without a warrant.
Watch and listen carefully https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1nUf8YY1oY
In Klaymanā v.ā Obama (2015), Kavanaugh concurred when the circuit court denied an en banc rehearing of its decision to vacate a district court order blocking the Nationalā Securityā Agency's warrantless bulk collection of telephony metadata.[120][121] In his concurrence, Kavanaugh wrote that the metadata collection was not a search, and, even if it were, no reasonableā suspicion would be required because of the government's special need to prevent terrorist attacks.[122] In Klayman I, the plaintiffs, subscribers of Verizon Wireless, brought suit against the NSA, the Department of Justice, Verizon Communications, President Barack Obama, Eric Holder, the United States Attorney General, and General Keith B. Alexander, the Director of the National Security Agency.[3] The plaintiffs alleged that the government is conducting a "secret and illegal government scheme to intercept vast quantities of domestic telephonic communications" and that the program violates First, Fourth and Fifth Amendment and exceeds statutory authority granted by Section 215.[3] In Klayman II, the plaintiffs sued the same government defendants and in addition, Facebook, Yahoo!, Google, Microsoft, YouTube, AOL, PalTalk, Skype, Sprint, AT&T, Apple again alleging the bulk metadata collection violates the First, Fourth and Fifth Amendment and constitutes divulgence of communication records in violation of Section 2702 of Stored Communications Act.[4]
Check out @TomFittonās Tweet: https://twitter.com/TomFitton/status/1045850421867270144?s=09
fbi already looked at in sept 13th or around that. nothing here
same return story
š±
@woodsracer544 lol the meme
Lol
Law clerk hiring practices and controversy
More than half of KaĀvanaugh's law clerks have been women (25 of 48) and more than a quarĀter have been peoĀple of color (13 of 48).[70] A numĀber of KaĀvanaugh's law clerks are the chilĀdren of other judges and high proĀfile legal figĀures, inĀcludĀing ClayĀton KozinĀski (son of forĀmer fedĀeral Judge Alexā
KozinĀski), Porter WilkinĀson (daughĀter of Judge J.ā
Harvieā
WilkinĀsonā
III), Philip Alito (son of JusĀticeā
Samuelā
Alito), Sophia Chua-RubenĀfeld (daughĀter of Yale Law ProĀfesĀsor Amyā
Chua), and Emily Chertoff (daughĀter of forĀmer DHS SecĀreĀtary Michaelā
Chertoff).[139][140]
On SepĀtemĀber 20, 2018, Theā
Guardian reĀported that two promiĀnent Yale proĀfesĀsors had adĀvised feĀmale law stuĀdents at Yale that their physĀiĀcal atĀtracĀtiveĀness and femĀiĀninĀity could play a role in seĀcurĀing a clerkĀship with KaĀvanaugh. Amyā
Chua reĀportĀedly stated that feĀmale law stuĀdents should exude a "model-like" femĀiĀninĀity and "dress outĀgoĀing" in their job inĀterĀview with KaĀvanaugh. Jedā
RubenĀfeld reĀportĀedly stated that KaĀvanaugh "hires women with a cerĀtain look".[141] In a stateĀment to The Guardian in reĀsponse to the reĀport, Chua reĀleased a stateĀment in which she deĀnied the noĀtion that KaĀvanaugh's hirĀing was imĀpacted by the atĀtracĀtiveĀness of feĀmale clerks. She stated, "Judge KaĀvanaugh's first and only litĀmus test in hirĀing has been excellence."[141] Yale Law School Dean Heather Gerken has stated that the alĀleĀgaĀtions reĀported by the Guardian "are of enorĀmous conĀcern to me and the school", and Yale is curĀrently inĀvesĀtiĀgatĀing the allegations.[142]
G'day all Happy Friday š š¤
@woodsracer544š