Message from @Semtex

Discord ID: 495419651816292363


2018-09-29 01:59:08 UTC  

I hate them

2018-09-29 01:59:15 UTC  

šŸ”„

2018-09-29 01:59:48 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435869520998170624/495414361863618578/DoNZnBRWkAI3kNt.png

2018-09-29 02:01:12 UTC  

Piss on Blumenthal, Liar, rat faced TURDšŸ’©

2018-09-29 02:01:38 UTC  

@V77 Hello how are you it's Unbelievable what these people the Demon-Rats did to Judge Brett Kavanaugh his Wife his 2 little girls his Family I cried when he was in Tears

2018-09-29 02:02:35 UTC  

In 2014, Kavanaugh concurred in the judgment when the en banc D.C. Circuit found that the Free Speech Clause did not forbid the government from requiring meatpackers to include a country of origin label on their products.[111][112] In United States Telecom Ass'n v. FCC (2016), Kavanaugh dissented when the en banc circuit refused to rehear a rejected challenge to the net neutrality rule, writing, "Congress did not clearly authorize the FCC to issue the net neutrality rule".[38][113][114]

2018-09-29 02:09:41 UTC  

Fourth Amendment and civil liberties

In NoĀ­vemĀ­ber 2010, KaĀ­vanaugh disĀ­sented from the deĀ­nial of reĀ­hearĀ­ing en banc after the cirĀ­cuit found that atĀ­tachĀ­ing a Global PoĀ­siĀ­tionĀ­ing SysĀ­tem trackĀ­ing deĀ­vice to a veĀ­hiĀ­cle viĀ­oĀ­lated the Fourth AmendĀ­ment to the United States ConĀ­stiĀ­tuĀ­tion.[115][116] The cirĀ­cuit's judgĀ­ment was then afĀ­firmed by the Supreme Court in United States v. Jones (2012).[117] In FebĀ­ruĀ­ary 2016, KaĀ­vanaugh disĀ­sented when the en banc cirĀ­cuit reĀ­fused to reĀ­hear poĀ­lice ofĀ­fiĀ­cers' reĀ­jected claims of qualĀ­iĀ­fied imĀ­muĀ­nity for arĀ­restĀ­ing parĀ­tyĀ­goĀ­ers in a vaĀ­cant house.[38][118] In DisĀ­trict of CoĀ­lumĀ­bia v. Wesby (2018), the Supreme Court unanĀ­iĀ­mously reĀ­versed the cirĀ­cuit's judgment.[119]

2018-09-29 02:09:59 UTC  

@Dina ā¤ļø Demon-rats is right. It’s vile. It Turns my stomach.

2018-09-29 02:10:27 UTC  

His beautiful family.

2018-09-29 02:10:35 UTC  

It’s evil.

2018-09-29 02:11:16 UTC  

Brb

2018-09-29 02:11:25 UTC  

Afk

2018-09-29 02:12:15 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435869520998170624/495417495461560330/93ce02b46fb4849a050609eac39806df69d4f26c599003c2d757eb14aaddc81c.png

2018-09-29 02:12:46 UTC  

Communists

2018-09-29 02:12:57 UTC  

Facts of the case
Antoine Jones was arrested on Oct. 24, 2005, for drug possession after police attached a tracker to Jones's Jeep -- without judicial approval -- and used it to follow him for a month. A jury found Jones not guilty on all charges save for conspiracy, on which point jurors hung. District prosecutors, upset at the loss, re-filed a single count of conspiracy against Jones and his business partner, Lawrence Maynard. Jones owned the "Levels" nightclub in the District of Columbia. Jones and Maynard were then convicted, but a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled that the Supreme Court specifically stated in a 1983 case regarding the use of a beeper to track a suspect that the decision could not be used to justify 24-hour surveillance without a warrant.

2018-09-29 02:13:36 UTC  
2018-09-29 02:13:47 UTC  

In Klayman v. Obama (2015), Kavanaugh concurred when the circuit court denied an en banc rehearing of its decision to vacate a district court order blocking the National Security Agency's warrantless bulk collection of telephony metadata.[120][121] In his concurrence, Kavanaugh wrote that the metadata collection was not a search, and, even if it were, no reasonable suspicion would be required because of the government's special need to prevent terrorist attacks.[122] In Klayman I, the plaintiffs, subscribers of Verizon Wireless, brought suit against the NSA, the Department of Justice, Verizon Communications, President Barack Obama, Eric Holder, the United States Attorney General, and General Keith B. Alexander, the Director of the National Security Agency.[3] The plaintiffs alleged that the government is conducting a "secret and illegal government scheme to intercept vast quantities of domestic telephonic communications" and that the program violates First, Fourth and Fifth Amendment and exceeds statutory authority granted by Section 215.[3] In Klayman II, the plaintiffs sued the same government defendants and in addition, Facebook, Yahoo!, Google, Microsoft, YouTube, AOL, PalTalk, Skype, Sprint, AT&T, Apple again alleging the bulk metadata collection violates the First, Fourth and Fifth Amendment and constitutes divulgence of communication records in violation of Section 2702 of Stored Communications Act.[4]

2018-09-29 02:18:05 UTC  
2018-09-29 02:18:33 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435869520998170624/495419080539504682/unknown.png

2018-09-29 02:23:37 UTC  

fbi already looked at in sept 13th or around that. nothing here

2018-09-29 02:25:09 UTC  

same return story

2018-09-29 02:26:30 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435869520998170624/495421082619084811/DoOaufRVYAA0Roy.png

2018-09-29 02:26:43 UTC  

😱

2018-09-29 02:27:23 UTC  

@woodsracer544 lol the meme

2018-09-29 02:28:45 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435869520998170624/495421649932517386/DoOcIxLVsAAl1EK.png

2018-09-29 02:28:49 UTC  

Lol

2018-09-29 02:28:52 UTC  

Law clerk hiring practices and controversy

More than half of KaĀ­vanaugh's law clerks have been women (25 of 48) and more than a quarĀ­ter have been peoĀ­ple of color (13 of 48).[70] A numĀ­ber of KaĀ­vanaugh's law clerks are the chilĀ­dren of other judges and high proĀ­file legal figĀ­ures, inĀ­cludĀ­ing ClayĀ­ton KozinĀ­ski (son of forĀ­mer fedĀ­eral Judge Alex KozinĀ­ski), Porter WilkinĀ­son (daughĀ­ter of Judge J. Harvie WilkinĀ­son III), Philip Alito (son of JusĀ­tice Samuel Alito), Sophia Chua-RubenĀ­feld (daughĀ­ter of Yale Law ProĀ­fesĀ­sor Amy Chua), and Emily Chertoff (daughĀ­ter of forĀ­mer DHS SecĀ­reĀ­tary Michael Chertoff).[139][140]

On SepĀ­temĀ­ber 20, 2018, The Guardian reĀ­ported that two promiĀ­nent Yale proĀ­fesĀ­sors had adĀ­vised feĀ­male law stuĀ­dents at Yale that their physĀ­iĀ­cal atĀ­tracĀ­tiveĀ­ness and femĀ­iĀ­ninĀ­ity could play a role in seĀ­curĀ­ing a clerkĀ­ship with KaĀ­vanaugh. Amy Chua reĀ­portĀ­edly stated that feĀ­male law stuĀ­dents should exude a "model-like" femĀ­iĀ­ninĀ­ity and "dress outĀ­goĀ­ing" in their job inĀ­terĀ­view with KaĀ­vanaugh. Jed RubenĀ­feld reĀ­portĀ­edly stated that KaĀ­vanaugh "hires women with a cerĀ­tain look".[141] In a stateĀ­ment to The Guardian in reĀ­sponse to the reĀ­port, Chua reĀ­leased a stateĀ­ment in which she deĀ­nied the noĀ­tion that KaĀ­vanaugh's hirĀ­ing was imĀ­pacted by the atĀ­tracĀ­tiveĀ­ness of feĀ­male clerks. She stated, "Judge KaĀ­vanaugh's first and only litĀ­mus test in hirĀ­ing has been excellence."[141] Yale Law School Dean Heather Gerken has stated that the alĀ­leĀ­gaĀ­tions reĀ­ported by the Guardian "are of enorĀ­mous conĀ­cern to me and the school", and Yale is curĀ­rently inĀ­vesĀ­tiĀ­gatĀ­ing the allegations.[142]

2018-09-29 02:35:01 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435869520998170624/495423225535397899/3930c77737e669501a7712b2015ae10290fee8e2b3b4d9fc2e2bb1f6ee073d73.png

2018-09-29 02:35:13 UTC  

G'day all Happy Friday 😁 šŸ¤—

2018-09-29 02:36:15 UTC  
2018-09-29 02:36:25 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435869520998170624/495423578385416214/69a1b2aec3ec1f601e5e1ba59abaafbdcaa551fb40b674209cdd37e001b918fa.jpg

2018-09-29 02:37:23 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435869520998170624/495423822510424064/3ed6fd6d063f7311571e76cc4a2f5060240b56f1497ee1e446bdb2c0e94747b3.png

2018-09-29 02:41:08 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435869520998170624/495424766237212672/ab55edfbc1ab3644bc2e7a5aa9b7bf165103fde2adfa169f9d7c76e141c5c147.png

2018-09-29 02:42:31 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435869520998170624/495425113659932672/eea995c93a22872d73e5f39a0d31aeef0e5a07acb7f24d908aa4d01bc2f430a7.jpg