Message from @DataVoid
Discord ID: 759157394944688188
She was the one that stopped trump from getting ride of obama care
that's tells you everything you need to now
<a:greenricardo:589193269112733697>
No single issue will throw the election
One of the lies being spread to support Barrett is that her lockdown opinion didn't say anything about the US Constitution. The Barrett pro-lockdown ruling made very clear it "took off the table" ANY challenge to ANY lockdown order based on ANY claim of "protection of liberty."
> <@&758768006217072646> https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1309590041287708672
@Vicious dude thats funny af tbh. im sure thats a joke
Few judges in America would be worse on FISA & FourthAmendment issues than Barrett. In 40+ cases I read & reviewed by Barrett, she sided w/ the government over 90% of the time, a near-record, calling judicial remedy for 4th Amendment violations "not a personal right."
i just posted it
Most people's minds are already made up and one decision won't be the end all. It will be the overall climate
ye i responded to you @Vicious
PING REEEEEEEEE
A highlighted list of excuses Barrett used to excuse Fourth Amendment violations: the dog sniff was just a little extra at a traffic stop; "consent" from abbreviated demands by police to sign an unread document; magical sniffing abilities of police; near a border; cars can move.
oh herp
it's daily wire but their shit is sourced in the article
More Barrett excuses for 4th Amendment violations: blood draws don't "invade" your privacy; it's ok to be incompetent in violating civil rights if not "egregiously" or "mostly" incompetent; cops acting "outside jurisdiction" is just "too bad" & no"personal right" to remedy 4th.
Barrett immunized almost everyone accused of rights violations, granting immunity in 90%+ of all cases she decided on the topic & she hasn't found for a single person that ended up dead in police custody while explaining it's ok to kick someone on the ground to "control" them.
A list of the cases you can research & read for yourselves. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/19-2837/19-2837-2020-07-31.html https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/17-2196/17-2196-2019-02-13.html https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/18-3710/18-3710-2019-08-27.html https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000174-572b-d057-a37d-7fef3ec60000 https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/19-2092/19-2092-2020-09-15.html https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/20-1041/20-1041-2020-09-02.html
She is more left than RGB
You know that by flooding like this it makes you look like a paid actor right?
Your cheering for a fake person
She is a RINO
of the highest order
Barrett is a religious statist
I'm not cheering for anyone
@thinkingguy No she is not
She's authoritarian over all
No