Message from @Vicious
Discord ID: 759157041712726016
If they make a deal he will appear to be "bridging the divide" and all the rhetoric that comes with it
Barrett exclaimed the benefits of Jacobson, the decision that green-lit forced vaccines & carved out an emergency exception to Constitutional protection in "public health" or "emergency" cases used to justify forced sterilizations & detention camps. Read:
Barrett excused or immunized questionable police conduct in almost every seizure case or use of force case she came across, many with fact patterns that will make her easily demolished in the court of public opinion in the age of George Floyd. An example:
Trump will win 2020
Everyone calm down lol
I am not joking
If she gets in
trump will not win
She was the one that stopped trump from getting ride of obama care
that's tells you everything you need to now
<a:greenricardo:589193269112733697>
No single issue will throw the election
One of the lies being spread to support Barrett is that her lockdown opinion didn't say anything about the US Constitution. The Barrett pro-lockdown ruling made very clear it "took off the table" ANY challenge to ANY lockdown order based on ANY claim of "protection of liberty."
> <@&758768006217072646> https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1309590041287708672
@Vicious dude thats funny af tbh. im sure thats a joke
Few judges in America would be worse on FISA & FourthAmendment issues than Barrett. In 40+ cases I read & reviewed by Barrett, she sided w/ the government over 90% of the time, a near-record, calling judicial remedy for 4th Amendment violations "not a personal right."
Most people's minds are already made up and one decision won't be the end all. It will be the overall climate
ye i responded to you @Vicious
PING REEEEEEEEE
A highlighted list of excuses Barrett used to excuse Fourth Amendment violations: the dog sniff was just a little extra at a traffic stop; "consent" from abbreviated demands by police to sign an unread document; magical sniffing abilities of police; near a border; cars can move.
oh herp
it's daily wire but their shit is sourced in the article
More Barrett excuses for 4th Amendment violations: blood draws don't "invade" your privacy; it's ok to be incompetent in violating civil rights if not "egregiously" or "mostly" incompetent; cops acting "outside jurisdiction" is just "too bad" & no"personal right" to remedy 4th.
Barrett immunized almost everyone accused of rights violations, granting immunity in 90%+ of all cases she decided on the topic & she hasn't found for a single person that ended up dead in police custody while explaining it's ok to kick someone on the ground to "control" them.
A list of the cases you can research & read for yourselves. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/19-2837/19-2837-2020-07-31.html https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/17-2196/17-2196-2019-02-13.html https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/18-3710/18-3710-2019-08-27.html https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000174-572b-d057-a37d-7fef3ec60000 https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/19-2092/19-2092-2020-09-15.html https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/20-1041/20-1041-2020-09-02.html
She is more left than RGB