That means the dems have had 2 yrs to research her

So in case of contested election and trump does shit, sue sides with him

GET THAT IN YOUR HEAD

Bruh I need the act blue citation

^

And why would Dems vote against her when she was nominated for her state level

He would not nominate her if he knew she would turn on him

https://thefederalist.com/2020/09/25/amy-coney-barrett-isnt-just-the-best-woman-for-scotus-but-the-best-person-period/#.X24P8hLDZfg.twitter

The Federalist society is an act blue company

Diane feinstein complained her "faith is loud" or whatever

Wait till saturday

E vi d e n c e

He probably said “I’ll nominate you but if it gets to the courts your on my side” and she probably agreed

Did trump officially say it?!

https://twitter.com/OrganizingPow3r/status/1308769093865156611 More Barrett excuses for 4th Amendment violations: blood draws don't "invade" your privacy; it's ok to be incompetent in violating civil rights if not "egregiously" or "mostly" incompetent; cops acting "outside jurisdiction" is just "too bad" & no"personal right" to remedy 4th.
Barrett immunized almost everyone accused of rights violations, granting immunity in 90%+ of all cases she decided on the topic & she hasn't found for a single person that ended up dead in police custody while explaining it's ok to kick someone on the ground to "control" them.
A list of the cases you can research & read for yourselves. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/19-2837/19-2837-2020-07-31.html https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/17-2196/17-2196-2019-02-13.html https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/18-3710/18-3710-2019-08-27.html https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000174-572b-d057-a37d-7fef3ec60000 https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/19-2092/19-2092-2020-09-15.html https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/20-1041/20-1041-2020-09-02.html

Barrett found a dubious "standing" excuse to deny citizens the right to prevent the corrupt misappropriation of property for the building of the Obama library. This is the kind of elite back-scratching Roberts-type jurists like Barrett do. https://www.isba.org/cases/7thcircuit/2020/08/21/protectourparksincvchicagoparkdistr

SHE BACKED OBAMA

YOU FUCKING RETARDS

Remember when citizens challenged the impropriety of using city parks to build Obama's presidential center? Guess who came to Obama's rescue, using a dubious interpretation of standing to deny citizen access to the courts? That "trusted conservative" Judge Barrett

I can source you absolutely everything on this

Are you arguing with yourself? Cause I dont see anyone cheerleading her?

She is a democrat

period

No she isn't

Your retarded

She is the goal of trump's version of the Republican party, authoritarian.

You also just keep copy pasting literally the same argument, for the 3rd time

backing obama, blocking all trumps actions legally, being backed by the The Federalist Society, Backed all the democrat lock downs, backed all the leftist actions on school teaching = not democrat

Ok give me evidence to change my mind

I have sourced everything for my point of view

now your turn

give me evidence she is not a democrat in sheep's clothing

Lol still can't find anything about federalist being actblue

saying muh cathloic

Seems like no one knows

Is not an argument

Ok she backed obama

wheres the evidence she backed obama?

what more do you want

and she blocked trump

= republican's