Message from @autisticNstuff
Discord ID: 759160752429989938
GG game over Biden wins
If DonaldTrump picks Barrett, I would drop Senate odds for GOP to hold the Senate to 50% and Trump's chance of re-election to 50%. It has the potential to be that consequential.
You guys are retards
I'm calling BS on this, let it ride out... trump always says dont let your plans be known... she was in consideration back in the kavanaugh days
She has proven that she is for full federal government power
Oh yeah not wanting a person that is backed by a act blue subset company is retarded
SHE IS A DEMOCRAT
That means the dems have had 2 yrs to research her
So in case of contested election and trump does shit, sue sides with him
GET THAT IN YOUR HEAD
Bruh I need the act blue citation
^
And why would Dems vote against her when she was nominated for her state level
He would not nominate her if he knew she would turn on him
The Federalist society is an act blue company
Diane feinstein complained her "faith is loud" or whatever
Wait till saturday
E vi d e n c e
He probably said “I’ll nominate you but if it gets to the courts your on my side” and she probably agreed
https://twitter.com/OrganizingPow3r/status/1308769093865156611 More Barrett excuses for 4th Amendment violations: blood draws don't "invade" your privacy; it's ok to be incompetent in violating civil rights if not "egregiously" or "mostly" incompetent; cops acting "outside jurisdiction" is just "too bad" & no"personal right" to remedy 4th.
Barrett immunized almost everyone accused of rights violations, granting immunity in 90%+ of all cases she decided on the topic & she hasn't found for a single person that ended up dead in police custody while explaining it's ok to kick someone on the ground to "control" them.
A list of the cases you can research & read for yourselves. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/19-2837/19-2837-2020-07-31.html https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/17-2196/17-2196-2019-02-13.html https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/18-3710/18-3710-2019-08-27.html https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000174-572b-d057-a37d-7fef3ec60000 https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/19-2092/19-2092-2020-09-15.html https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/20-1041/20-1041-2020-09-02.html
Barrett found a dubious "standing" excuse to deny citizens the right to prevent the corrupt misappropriation of property for the building of the Obama library. This is the kind of elite back-scratching Roberts-type jurists like Barrett do. https://www.isba.org/cases/7thcircuit/2020/08/21/protectourparksincvchicagoparkdistr
SHE BACKED OBAMA
YOU FUCKING RETARDS
Remember when citizens challenged the impropriety of using city parks to build Obama's presidential center? Guess who came to Obama's rescue, using a dubious interpretation of standing to deny citizen access to the courts? That "trusted conservative" Judge Barrett
I can source you absolutely everything on this
Are you arguing with yourself? Cause I dont see anyone cheerleading her?
She is a democrat
period
No she isn't
Your retarded
She is the goal of trump's version of the Republican party, authoritarian.
You also just keep copy pasting literally the same argument, for the 3rd time
backing obama, blocking all trumps actions legally, being backed by the The Federalist Society, Backed all the democrat lock downs, backed all the leftist actions on school teaching = not democrat
Ok give me evidence to change my mind
I have sourced everything for my point of view
now your turn
give me evidence she is not a democrat in sheep's clothing
Lol still can't find anything about federalist being actblue
saying muh cathloic