Gimme 2A or takings or something.

Barrett's most famous 2A dissent argues that non-violent felonies can't remove your 2A rights

OK, that's not bad.

I mean if we are really going to have an argument on this matter. I can default to people like Robert Barrens and other good constitutional lawyers

They have the same view on the matter

She looks pretty good to me

I mean, I wanted Rushing, not Barrett - I just don't think Barrett is a bad pick, just a less good pick. I mean shit, she's better than Roberts who really did fuck everyone right in the asshole, repeatedly.

In my personally opinion

She will backstab trump

and i doubt she will pass the senate

I think Trump and Mitch already have that figured out.

The senate vote is secured

Are you stupid

Also THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS 'BACKSTABBING'

You can't argue she isn't qualified.

Senate already has the votes

51

Once pushed to the supreme court you are to uphold the constitution of the united states, not the president that elevated you

what are you talking about? Roberts, Bork

What are you on?

Roberts is on the court. Bork got borked, but he was the first, ever since then it has been partisan.

His name is a verb now.

I watched it on TV as it happened.

I am not pollical on these things. I don't care about left or right. I care about actions taken to support liberty

her actions show me she is opposed to that

make of that what you will

<:bruh:758871794903154759>

TBH, Conservative and Liberty aren't 100% in Lockstep, just 90%.

glad to see you have zero power and can't even read your own court cases, my guy

Don't let perfect be the enemy of good.

Yes.

My only complaint about Barrett is her bizarre papistry

Fuck papists

Fuck those beholden to popery

but saying political back stabbing isn't a thing is patently absurd and completely detached from reality

>completely absurd

Trump is nowhere near a golden apple when it comes to constitutionality or legality

If he gets fucked in the courts - so be it

That's his own fault

<:atlast:758774926869004348>

Merits of the case, not the individual