https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/18-3710/18-3710-2019-08-27.html

You're facing 200 years of jurisprudence there

Almost globally, too

Good luck, lmao

Reminder that NYC used to heard immigrants out at gunpoint and vaccinate them

I dont need to be lucky Lagoa opposed the rulling

Reminder that the US used actual concentration camps

To vaccinate the Phillipines population

I'm on the fence about this Freedom of worship vs public health. It certainly isn't make or break for me. What you got on 2A or Kelo style shit?

Ok i dont care

We termed concentration camps btw

That was outs

lagoa was opposed to this rulling

Barrett was not

Fuck you, Germany

THAT WAS OUR WORD

Picking Barrett is not a smart political judicial move

Yeah

Gimme 2A or takings or something.

Barrett's most famous 2A dissent argues that non-violent felonies can't remove your 2A rights

OK, that's not bad.

I mean if we are really going to have an argument on this matter. I can default to people like Robert Barrens and other good constitutional lawyers

They have the same view on the matter

She looks pretty good to me

I mean, I wanted Rushing, not Barrett - I just don't think Barrett is a bad pick, just a less good pick. I mean shit, she's better than Roberts who really did fuck everyone right in the asshole, repeatedly.

In my personally opinion

She will backstab trump

and i doubt she will pass the senate

I think Trump and Mitch already have that figured out.

The senate vote is secured

Are you stupid

Also THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS 'BACKSTABBING'

You can't argue she isn't qualified.

Senate already has the votes

51

Once pushed to the supreme court you are to uphold the constitution of the united states, not the president that elevated you

what are you talking about? Roberts, Bork

What are you on?

Roberts is on the court. Bork got borked, but he was the first, ever since then it has been partisan.

His name is a verb now.

I watched it on TV as it happened.