Senate already has the votes

51

Once pushed to the supreme court you are to uphold the constitution of the united states, not the president that elevated you

what are you talking about? Roberts, Bork

What are you on?

Roberts is on the court. Bork got borked, but he was the first, ever since then it has been partisan.

His name is a verb now.

I watched it on TV as it happened.

I am not pollical on these things. I don't care about left or right. I care about actions taken to support liberty

her actions show me she is opposed to that

make of that what you will

<:bruh:758871794903154759>

TBH, Conservative and Liberty aren't 100% in Lockstep, just 90%.

glad to see you have zero power and can't even read your own court cases, my guy

Don't let perfect be the enemy of good.

Yes.

My only complaint about Barrett is her bizarre papistry

Fuck papists

Fuck those beholden to popery

but saying political back stabbing isn't a thing is patently absurd and completely detached from reality

>completely absurd

Trump is nowhere near a golden apple when it comes to constitutionality or legality

If he gets fucked in the courts - so be it

That's his own fault

<:atlast:758774926869004348>

Merits of the case, not the individual

You can go on attacking people characters and spering with no evidence to back your claims. I am not going to participate in this childish nonsense

weren't you the guy claiming that the US entered WW1 at the behest of bribery from the 'queen' last night

Or was that another brainlet

so how much rage is there about her

<:autism:758872218276200478>

on a scale of 1-10

If you'd like an absolutely clean pro-constitutionalist candidate for the courts, de-age Ron Paul by 60 years and have him go to law school

As it is you're stuck with shades of gray

Alternatively, be the change you'd like to see and enter into the federal court system yourself

I will be patiently waiting another decade for an anti-AWB/mag ban case to be heard, myself

if your make arguments from the accepted authority position (i personally don't see that as valid argumentation). I can source you a lot of highly respected right wing lawyers that disagree with her nomination https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1308923077447888902 https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1309600719167565824

and before you attack the source without proper information. I suggest looking into his rullings to see where he stands

It quite literally means nothing to me if the GOP holds the senate or the presidency

Perhaps they'd like to actually do something with the majority they'd held before

Instead of fucking nothing - including banning bump stocks