Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 471879088613621760


2018-07-26 03:12:47 UTC  

I would argue ethnicity has a far stronger basis

2018-07-26 03:13:11 UTC  

Also something I didn't mention, diversity in and of itself is a negative for society

2018-07-26 03:13:13 UTC  

given that the european race has torn themselves apart across ethnic lines

2018-07-26 03:13:53 UTC  

So it's always a negative to have diverse populations in close proximity to each other

2018-07-26 03:14:17 UTC  

not if the benefits of the additional population outweigh the negatives of diversity

2018-07-26 03:14:31 UTC  

So there are many practical benefits for all white Societies

2018-07-26 03:14:44 UTC  

I just asserted the opposite

2018-07-26 03:14:55 UTC  

Whites don't need any other race

2018-07-26 03:15:01 UTC  

Maybe blacks do?

2018-07-26 03:15:11 UTC  

(clearly)

2018-07-26 03:15:31 UTC  

I know I've seen Putnum and friends and the negatives clearly are something that can be easily outweighed by benefits of additional population depending on what your goals are

2018-07-26 03:15:57 UTC  

Yes every race fights among themselves...that's not a "european" thing....we do it better maybe lol

2018-07-26 03:16:26 UTC  

Yes, if your goal is cheap labor, sure

2018-07-26 03:16:47 UTC  

it doesn't need to be exclusive to europeans to be a meaningful sign that ethnicity trumps race

2018-07-26 03:17:02 UTC  

Immigration is not required from outside groups

2018-07-26 03:17:13 UTC  

It's not necessary

2018-07-26 03:17:26 UTC  

Ethnicity is important

2018-07-26 03:17:47 UTC  

It's the next higher order than race....race then ethnicity

2018-07-26 03:18:01 UTC  

Or outer ring of identity

2018-07-26 03:18:41 UTC  

again it depends on what your goals are. Economic growth, increased production, general prosperity-- the inclusion of east asian immigrants has certainly produced more of these things, leaving lower races aside

2018-07-26 03:19:01 UTC  

So it's something like.... Family and race then ethnicity, then like region or territory

2018-07-26 03:19:46 UTC  

"muh country" types are very tied to territory though they dont say it....it comes out when they talk policy

2018-07-26 03:20:14 UTC  

of course since flag and country is the primary means of mobilizing a multi-racial and multi-ethnic block

2018-07-26 03:20:41 UTC  

Yes....but appeals to race and family are very common

2018-07-26 03:20:48 UTC  

Within that

2018-07-26 03:21:10 UTC  

They use every tool in the tool box

2018-07-26 03:21:25 UTC  

That's kind of a tangent....war propaganda

2018-07-26 03:22:12 UTC  

They don't refrain from otherizing the enemy in clear racial terms when it is important

2018-07-26 03:22:20 UTC  

sure

2018-07-26 03:22:37 UTC  

It's always important.....

2018-07-26 03:23:03 UTC  

But not to multinational corporations

2018-07-26 03:23:08 UTC  

🤔

2018-07-26 03:23:10 UTC  

just to be clear I'm very familiar with all of these arguments already, I used to be solidly alt-right

2018-07-26 03:23:16 UTC  

So

2018-07-26 03:23:21 UTC  

Why ask?

2018-07-26 03:23:27 UTC  

If you know

2018-07-26 03:23:53 UTC  

I suppose because I was engaging in discussion/argument

2018-07-26 03:23:57 UTC  

Just seeing what I'd say?

2018-07-26 03:24:04 UTC  

That's cool

2018-07-26 03:24:45 UTC  

Whyd you 'fall from grace'?

2018-07-26 03:28:19 UTC  

because although genetic science clearly disproves the retarded principles of universalism and racial egalitarian fantasies it also shows that if you actually wanted to go as far as possible to improve the genetic stock of your country or otherwise seek to create a 'master race' it would be a waste to exclude all members from other races. Furthermore, I think that it's reasonable to presume that CRISPR and other genetic modification tools are on the horizon and I believe that they will render traditional racial/ethnic blocks effectively obsolete.