Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 489633109101510667
Down in the dirt, where they belong
alright but they’re at least important to the election whether you like them or not
Happy now?
Ahhh fuck
ty
lmao not even second place
I predicted this would be how it would turn out and im sad I was right. So from what I understand sweden is dead right?
honestly a split into north and south would be useful
i mean even if sd doesn't get into government these results will probably put pressure on the new government to tackle immigration
"Republicans Were Mad at Twitter for Banning Alex Jones. Then They Met Him." by Will Oremus, Slate
This headline makes the false assumption that because Jones rubbed Rubio the wrong way, Republicans as a whole no longer wish to defend him from this censorship. The irony of this headline is the fact that Jones and Rubio's exchange occurred before Alex was even banned from Twitter (Alex got banned a day or two afterwards). Plus, Marco Rubio says he doesn't even know Alex Jones, so how could he possibly be among the Republicans defending Alex from social media censorship?
http://archive.is/TYWoy
“ Trump is harming the dream of America more than any foreign adversary ever could “ Joe Scarborough on Washington Post
Scarborough claims that Trump is worse than Osama bin Laden, who did 9/11. It also implies that Trump is continuing Osamas “ goal” and calls Trump a “ tyrant” who should be “ consigned to the ash heap of history “. His celebration of Osamas death in juxtaposition to his comparison to Trump doing more harm, looks like a veiled call for assassination.
http://archive.today/UCTTJ
“ Assessing Russian activities and intentions in recent US elections “ ICA Intelligence Community Assessment
This is the assessment that was giving to President Trump in Jan 2017 concerning election meddling. The CIA , FBI and CIA contributed to this document. This is commonly used by proponents of the Trump Russia conspiracy theory. A few things of note.
1. It doesn’t implicate Trump or anybody in is campaign in any wrong doing.
2. It explicitly states that they did not “ make an assessment of the impact that Russian activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election “
3. They claim to all have “ High confidence “ that Russia made efforts to influence the election on the direct order of Putin.
4. They also concluded that Russia did it in an effort to help Trump. The CIA and FBI had “High confidence “ and the NSA had “ Moderate confidence “
5. This is the money shot. Under their “ Estimative language “ section they explain what the previous mentioned confidence levels mean. Even under the highest level of confidence, they admit that “ High Confidence in a judgment does not imply that the assessment is a fact or a certainty; such judgments might be wrong.” They go on to explain that Moderate Confidence means that the information is “ plausible but not of sufficient quality “
Nothing in this whole report is a fact, they admit it could all be wrong , and the NSA seems skeptical that Russia favored Trump in this influence campaign.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/488406264951472148/488406762488070155/ODNI_Statement_on_Declassified_Intelligence_Community_Assessment_of_Russian_Activities_and_Intention.pdf
Hahahaha
Maybe they’ll start shooting themselves in the head.
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/12/professor-shoots-himself-22-pistol-protest-donald-trump/
*his injuries arent life threatning*
Too bad @L0GAN
“ Leaked Video: Google leadership dismayed reaction to Trump election at conference “
https://youtu.be/E5gPdrlyc84
"Photo shows Trump pumping fists en route to September 11 memorial service" by John Haltiwanger, Business Insider
Business Insider, as well as the rest of the MSM, use a specific camera angle of Trump pumping his fists on 9/11 to portray him as being disrespectful to victims of 9/11. Other camera angles show that in fact Trump was approaching a fence full of military and (presumably) their families. He was pumping his fists in greeting. He was excited to see them and they were excited to see him. This has nothing to do with being disrespectful to 9/11 victims.
http://archive.fo/ocU11
ah np, just wanted to post for those that don't want to bother typing it out like I did
@Deleted User -dosent mention Breitbart leaked video-
I shared it @Doctor Anon scroll up a bit.
@Deleted User Another example of fake news and journalists taking things completely out of context
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-europe-migrants-italy-luxembourg/italys-salvini-likens-african-immigrants-to-slaves-idUSKCN1LU1QR
^the people you want in your country
^sounds like a party
lol
I told you all, but you did not listen.
please spread this information in all social media , many thanks
“ Rod Rosenstein suggested secretly recording Trump and discussed 25th amendment “ by Adam Goldman and Michael S. Schmidt
This article claims that Rosenstein has been plotting to overthrow Trump since nearly the beginning of his presidency. This is either epic fake news, or proof of a Deep State conspiracy. Especially if put in the context of their previous anonymous article claiming that high level officials were constantly sabotaging the presidency.
http://archive.today/0bXsx
George Soros funded hit piece on alternative news youtubers. Falsely claims connections between people that don’t exist. They try to connect white nationalist with liberals , conservatives, and libertarians.
http://archive.today/TvX9c
"Trump supporter on MSNBC: Facts don't matter" Opinion piece by Erik Wemple, Washington Post
This opinion piece claims that a Trump supporter said facts don't matter. He said nothing of the sort. He defended President Trump from attacks by the MSM for using a false statistic in a tweet, saying that they have been ignoring the fact that the economy has been doing well regardless of whether the statistic tweeted by Trump was correct. In no way did he say or imply that facts don't matter. Yet this opinion piece uses this flimsy evidence to draw a sweeping conclusion that this Trump supporter thinks facts don't matter.
http://archive.is/eIRtu
Credit to <https://www.reddit.com/r/HeadlineCorrections/>
“ Senate Democrats investigate a new allegation of sexual misconduct, from Brett Kavanaugh’s college years” by Ronan Farrow and Jane Mayer on The New Yorker
A few things to take from this article
1. She admits to “ gaps in memory “ due to excess drinking. She initially didn’t report this incident because she was unsure as to what happened. She only changed her certainty after six days of coaching from journalists and her attorney.
2. A gag penis was presented to her at the party. Of this she was always certain . According to her own recollection she was later confused. She was uncertain that a real penis was ever shown to her. The article says otherwise, but her exact quotes paint a different picture.
3. She says “ I’m confident about pants coming up” she claimed she saw him move his hips, and “ I’m confident about Brett being there” . Notice she doesn’t claim confidence that a real penis was put in her face, or that it was Kavanaugh’s.
4. They couldn’t find anyone who witnessed this event. They found people that claimed to hear rumors, and people that said they’ve never heard anything about this incident. They also fluffed the story up with people claiming she is credible.
http://archive.today/PIK9w
Six months into Trumps first term Brett McGurk, the Special Presidential Envoy to the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS on a panel clearly states that ISIS and Al Qaeda are the primary rebellious forces in Syria.
https://youtu.be/UgzqabDYK7I