Message from @el pebble
Discord ID: 527318044683403274
kek
just because we had a verse against jews the nazis wanted a german qur'an translation
Baptists are not Protestants
People are usually put in one of three religious groups. If you are not a Jew or a Roman Catholic, then automatically you are a Protestant. Consequently, Baptists are usually called "Protestants." However, this does not match the facts. Baptists never have been Protestants.
The Protestant Reformation is usually dated from October 31, 1517, when Martin Luther nailed his 95 Theses to the door of the Castle Church in Wittenburg, Germany. However, this was only one of a series of acts that led to the open rupture with Rome.
An event of utmost importance, but often unnoticed, is the Second Diet (or Council) of Speier, April 25, 1529. This was a Roman Catholic Council for the purpose of taking action against the Turks and checking the progress of Lutherans and others who were not cooperating with the Pope. Certain Lutheran princes appeared before this Roman Catholic Diet with a formal written protest against those matters in which the Diet went contrary to the Christian faith as they understood it. This protest was signed by Elector John of Saxony, Margrave George of Brandenburg, Dukes Ernest and Francis of Braunschweig-Luneburg, Landgrave Philip of Hesse, Prince Wolfgang of Anhalt and the representatives of fourteen imperial cities. The protest was designed to protect them from the decisions of this Council. It was a defensive measure. The celebrated church historian, Philip Schaaf, makes the noteworthy statement "From this protest. and appeal, the Lutherans were called Protestants." (History of the Christian Church, Volume VII, p.692). The same facts are stated in the Catholic Encyclopedia (Volume Xll, p.495).
These Lutheran leaders, and a few Reformed, who made this appeal and protest at the famous Diet of Speier were speaking for themselves and not for Baptists, of whom they themselves said in their written statement, "All Anabaptists and rebaptized persons, male or female, of mature age, shall be judged and brought from natural life to death, by fire, or sword or otherwise, as may benefit the persons, without preceding trial by spiritual judges." The Baptists then did not share in this protest and consequently cannot bear the name "Protestant."
Cardinal Hosius says, "Were it not that the Baptists have been grievously tormented and cut off with the knife during the past 1,200 years, they would swarm in greater number than all the Reformers" (Letters Apud Opera, pp.112, 113). Note carefully that this knowledgeable Catholic scholar has spoken of the vicious persecution Baptists have endured, that he clearly distinguishes them from the Reformers, and that he dates them 1,200 years before the Protestant Reformation
Christian Communalism
best system of government
decentralized communal federations
it is but the way of *koinonia*
@el pebble that's still heretical, you focus more on ideology than the religion itself, you only used religion as a means to an end, which is heretical.
>you cannot serve both god and money
>establish a political system entirely focused on materialistic goals rather than spiritual
I see a contradiction here
@Doctor Anon dude what
thats a strong claim
especially since the catholic worker movement's leader is possibly to be canonized by the Church
why would i not support an ideology that is the true bulwark of my faith
@Doctor Anon are you going to answer me
ортодонтия
The Jewish religion has negatively affected everyone. Christianity is a curious mix of Jewish beliefs and Pagan tradition and unfortunately, both are destroying Western society.
one of these people
>muh dead kike on a stick
>sand religion
heretic.
Jesus died so you would be saved from kike trickery in the future.
I'm a Jew. Sup
Imma ask you nicely, either help us tear down your people's zog machine or gas yourself.
imma party it up first
Epicest.
@4042 im starting to like evola more and more
@MinecraftMemer interestingly enough i find the history of christianity in europe interesting, on one hand it allowed europe to survive, on the other hand it seeks to destroy its ethnic homogeneity, and necessarily dose so usually through the organization of the church and its philosophy as in international and generally globalist entity, rather than a local one.
generally christianity in the east, so generally speaking slavic, some scandinavian, finnish etc. territories was absolutely and destructively enforced, not to mention essentially an area being crusaded because for example the balts were forming a polytheistic state. SO the tuetons decided to subdue them and introduce christianity so compeltely that they simply ended up causing a war and genociding the old prussians who no longer exist. Not to mention that the local pagan costoms were absolutely systematically destroyed, and records were pruposefully scarce. In one way christianity has sought to uproot the peoples of europe
in another way it functioned to stabilize their nationhood.
however i may be one of the few christians to say it, but in the end it seems that christianity is inherently, as an organization, against european homogeneity
Think that by uniting the people under one faith, it caused a lot more good than harm. It forced people to work together at the cost of national identity but by doing so it solidified a moral superiority in the people that eventually led to Nations of today.
And I mean nations as they were founded, not the modern depravity
"we think that if a Western tradition could be rebuilt it would be bound to take on a religious form in the strictest sense of this word, and that this form could only be Christian; for on the one hand the other possible forms have been too long foreign to the Western mentality, and on the other it is only in Christianity-and we can say still more definitely in Catholicism-that such remnants of a traditional spirit as still exist in the West are to be found. Every 'traditionalist' venture that ignores this fact is without foundation and therefore inevitably doomed to failure; it is self-evident that one can build only upon something that has a real existence, and that where there is lack of continuity, any reconstruction must be artificial and cannot endure." - Rene Guenon in Crisis of the modern world @Bogatyr Bogumir @Crazed Shotgun
Religion has definitely not allowed Europe to survive. If anything, it caused the decay of the Roman Empire, the weakness of several states including the United States today and tends to divide, rather than unite people, as seen in the Reformation. In order to make moral and ethical decisions that are logical, leaders must make decisions based on reason, not a book written by some Jews 2000 years ago.