but I think you would know that

it is hard to believe online larping

did you get tired of calling gentiles anti Semitic

stop calling those who offend you larpers lol

Even if forced treatment is currently illegal its the most probable thign to happen, when we look at homosexual populations we notice that they tend to not form lasting monogamistic relationships, are INCREDIBLY promiscuous, overrepresent 11X in pedophilia and even more in pederasty, Are prone to an absolute absurd amount of STD's getting one in their lifetime is basically a guarantee, Participate in grooming behaviours of younger same sex persons, Make decisions lightly when it comes to partners and "experimentation"

this is all grounds to actually diagnose a mental illness beyond the sexual orientation which is deviant in itself (many homo persons have been abused or had inapropriate contact with their parents, usually of the opposite sex or were raised single parent)

This is a very similar situation to Trans persons

literally they meet all the conditions for getting psychiatric care

The only reason its no logner considered is because of social and public pressure fueled by muh feelings and ideological shifts in the APA

and i read their saying "trans is not an illness"

where they based their conclusion on completely false data, or flawed studies

oh mah gawd

stahp calling me a larper

@Bogatyr Bogumir You hit it right on the nail. It was deemed an illness by WHO (or some other global medical organization, can't recall the exact organization) until years ago when this social bullshit got involved with politics and the medical treatment.

I n a c t i v i t y .

@Victor Von Doom Gender dysphoria

Homosexuality was on it for a very long time as well

@Victor Von Doom The other org is i think the APA (American psycholgical association)

tons of my psych profs have mentioned that there is, well they hinted at it, that there is reason to believe homosexuality and gender dysphoria to be psych illnesses that can in fact be treated.

honestly they are part of the reason i actually somewhat fight the power when it comes to scientific instututions running around with literal ideological dogma, that isnt based on any reason or logic other than furthering said ideology.

(Another example is race, rational wiki literally demonstrates this elvel of corruption within scientific institutions in the name of ideology, its absurd. On one hand race exists but it doesnt cuz its not called race, or issues of practicality or framing etc. literally constant non arguments to prove an ideology)

muh rasis syense <:brainlet:487682295889920016>

*Something factual disagrees with your ideology*

I-It's just ideological dogma! N-Not science!

It's such an odd coincidence how an overwhelming majority of the scientific community happens to disagree with y'all

someone mentioned race so let me just post this

Ethnicities even show this.

Though Europeans usually are multiple European ethnicities mixed together.

^Because of Imperialism.

because of war and economic integration you mean?

Europeans are mostly seperate ethnicities, not raelly mixed at all, even up until today. the USA is the only place these ethnicities reliably mixed, however on the continent the mixing is oddly rare however this is not unexpected.

@Alice Redacted *muh 98% of scientists disagree* honestly many scientists are driven by ideology very few are honest and the level of corruption in science is baffling. agreement does nto equate to truth. This is why individually we must investigate what conclusions we are being fed based on what evidence.

An example is the trans and homo issue in psychology, or the issue of race, ethnicities and anthropology and genetics. The issue for race is specifically so intense because of ideology. The fields have been so marred with politics that often times evidence is twisted, ignored or downright there is a refusal to publish said evidence in any prestigous journal, because of muh prestige and avoiding potential public backlash. Such a journal taking risks could mean its destruction as far as being called reliable.

The irony is religion is more honest than science currently is.

Why do u think native Americans never evolved from their stupid shit

@Bogatyr Bogumir stop being so salty

@Alice Redacted issue is im not, im actually in a field that has to participate in this shit regularly and there is a low key consensus between the profs and us to not be politically correct because it might get patients kileld, but officially we make no claims because muh funding, muh research papers, muh uni needs to be high class but to be high class it needs to have a high score that is purely determined by research papers produced.... which are financed by someone...

generally science has gone down the shitter and needs to go back to independant reserchers and multiple camps competing with each other. Because as of right now its an ideological cesspit with few industries remaining untouched.

What is so funny about religion being more honest than science?

@Bogatyr Bogumir

I'm still feeling some salt

Come at me next time with some real facts

Using people’s desires for meaning in life to take their money and give them fairy tales and placebo isn’t dishonest?

@Victor Von Doom

We aren’t talking about Scientology, that is a cult. We are talking about religions.

And what is this fairytale nonsense?
Was Snow White a real figure in history? No.
Was Jesus? Yes.
Fairytales and religion aren’t comparable.
Every religion at the very least is built upon some sort of real world fact(s). Fairytales have no real world foundation and are openly told as lessons and not real events. Each religion states that it is a fact.