Yes

worked well for killing commies

then started a rebellion

Though i dont think it can scale to a large one

It could be *possible* though

Everyone loved the freikorps until the Kapp Putsch

that almost destroyed germany

@Doctor Anon Sure it is


Just ask Somalia.

Stateless society's past one person dont work

<:SquidDab:459545666725609493>

A stateless society is possible, I know of a few and they had to have existed at one point before civilization

But a stateless nation is by definition not possible

this is without even pondering whether it is ideal or effective by any means

Stateless nation isn't possible?
What is: Euskadi
What is: Punjab
What is: Uyghur people
What is: The Kurds
@EyeKanSpel

A nation is not the same thing as a nation-state. They're separate terms.

"na·tion

ˈnāSH(ə)n/

noun

a large aggregate of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a particular country or territory."

All four of those fit that definition.

In contrast with
"na·tion-state

noun

a sovereign state whose citizens or subjects are relatively homogeneous in factors such as language or common descent."

ex. Germany is a nation-state but Spain is not, because several nations inhabit it.

Including Euskadi.

No. There will always be someone superior, and that person will naturally have an accumulation of resources. These resources will be sought after by subordinates and a fee will be needed. This fee will be either in the form of a price, for a transaction, or a tax, for a service.

Africa

https://youtu.be/JNvE2UqRWRg

@εïз irma εïз Those are societies, not nations

When we think of a Nation, borders, government and international representation are involved

it depends on your definition of a state

to me, a state is a governing body which holds a monopoly on violence (a generally accepted definiton)

in most communes there is some sort of organization, whether official or unofficial, which makes decisions, consisting of either one leader or of a democratic sort of thing

to me that seems like a micro state

they hold a monopoly on violence in the commune and they make decisions using it

absolute anarchy can not exist within groups of people

because a hierarchy or order will inevitably develop

"stateless society" is an oxymoron

It's like asking if a society without people is a society

@Der Alte Fritz That's one of my favorite Johnny Rebel songs

@EyeKanSpel No. Just false lmao

Those are literally examples of nations.

"na·tion

ˈnāSH(ə)n/

noun

a large aggregate of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a particular country or territory."

Since you didn't read it the first time. You can't change the definitions of words.

Political scientists and anthropologists would both agree to that definition and that the examples I gave were nations.

So I'm not sure what you're trying to get at.