Haha!

I'm serious

yea, tho I don't like to call it welfare since that has a bad association to me

nig

I know.

Social Darwinism?

It would work

I don’t necessarily disagree.

Give them money in exchange for not reproducing

Yes but you would reduce the population and available workforce

The more poor people we have the less immigrants we have you braindead fuck lord

take care of your people, don't let them fail without help, and make them want to be better people. Instill in them pride and duty and take care of them like they are part of the greater family

Are you retarded nig

We need to cut down on the underclass

It would weed out low People with low IQ. If this was matched with incentives for productive people to reproduce, our net IQ would increase.

That will not encourage economic growth

Not you Solid

The problem with welfare is that it is never sustainable and produces a stupid populace

Yup

Welfare is nice. But not good

If people know they will be saved they will never learn from their mistakes

Distributism is the best answer to the Welfare Question

Probably

Look at the banks in '08

And we’re moving into more mechanization. AI too. Low IQ people are becoming less and less employable.

Welfare culling

Pay them to get snipped

Problem solved in a matter of generations

Welfare states just make it so that businesses can't keep their money and make more and better products to employ a bigger workforce

Austrian Economics 101

@Deleted User Wrong

@Deleted User In the entire history of machines, only one job has been fully eliminated by automation

FULLY

Fully

People still lost jobs.

Wrong

Machines statistically create nearly twice as many jobs as they kill

It's a positive ratio

which job do you speak of

anon

High skill jobs.