Message from @Da_Fish
Discord ID: 466621283119923200
Yeah
Yes
Pay the poor not to reproduce
Haha!
I'm serious
yea, tho I don't like to call it welfare since that has a bad association to me
nig
I know.
Social Darwinism?
It would work
I don’t necessarily disagree.
Give them money in exchange for not reproducing
Yes but you would reduce the population and available workforce
The more poor people we have the less immigrants we have you braindead fuck lord
take care of your people, don't let them fail without help, and make them want to be better people. Instill in them pride and duty and take care of them like they are part of the greater family
Are you retarded nig
We need to cut down on the underclass
It would weed out low People with low IQ. If this was matched with incentives for productive people to reproduce, our net IQ would increase.
That will not encourage economic growth
Not you Solid
Yup
Welfare is nice. But not good
If people know they will be saved they will never learn from their mistakes
Distributism is the best answer to the Welfare Question
Probably
Look at the banks in '08
And we’re moving into more mechanization. AI too. Low IQ people are becoming less and less employable.
Welfare culling
Pay them to get snipped
Problem solved in a matter of generations
Welfare states just make it so that businesses can't keep their money and make more and better products to employ a bigger workforce
Austrian Economics 101
@Deleted User Wrong
@Deleted User In the entire history of machines, only one job has been fully eliminated by automation
FULLY
Fully
People still lost jobs.
Wrong
Machines statistically create nearly twice as many jobs as they kill
It's a positive ratio