but you don't

I gotta go now tho

10/10 argument

'you don't'

'gotta go'

lmao

no, I was going to have to leave

did I need to say earlier so that you couldn't hold it against me?

I wasn't paying attention to everything you said

but that's fari

fair

I don't think you engage it intellectually honestly. A lot of people don't. But we disagree on what is happening in the system as it. It is often viewed from the wrong framework to defeat it. But I can come back another time if you wish to debate this further.

sure

National socialism is gibmedats for ypipo

I try to remain consistent, let me know if I don't next time we talk

nazbol and strasserism aren't even communist

strasserism only supports the workers owning half the enterprise

We disagree on some things which I'm sure naturally leads to perceived intellectual dishonesty. But there were also several of you to keep track of and just me on my side. I've no intention to mischaracterize if you are indeed debating in good faith. I was also in a bit of a rush at the time. I'll bring it back up later if you like.

I'm not really in the business of proselytizing for NatSoc as people mostly make up their mind on their own, and they often have some annoying misconceptions I'm not really keen to battle against. They will know and understand what they want a lot of times. This conversation just sorta happened. Debates are nice, but it's kinda pointless. CivNats/Libertarians aren't likely to relate with the notions of NatSoc. @Deleted User

natsoc is a system of pragmatism for the spiritual vanguard of the race

when it comes to politics

to ascribe an economic system to the worldview/philosophy is dangerous and dishonest

the first political rendition of national socialism, the NSDAP, followed very open market policies that collaborated with labor, giving precedent to social corporatism and social markets in general

even if they ended up going a different route than the original NSDAP labor and capital collaboration

@Deleted User you don't know what socialism is

@everyone 🔖 Daily Question

Are people entitled to any “human rights”? If so, which ones?

The right to free speech and the right to bear arms.

What about the other 8 amendments in the bill of rights

+the parts about the 1st you didn’t mention

the right to life only

Depends on what framework you are working under. I'd say no. Might makes right.

also u mum gay

The right to live and freedom of speech should be considered Human Rights

oh sorry i read the question wrong

Everything else stems from these two rights.

thanks

Well not exactly stem, but are products of

I’d agree

>semantics

might makes right