Message from @campodin
Discord ID: 487396088647647233
What? Are you treating morality as an object?
Is morality objective, or subjective?
You said objective, so that means it exists.
Which means there is a way to validate the facts surrounding it.
A concept can not be objective.
Yeah things can exist without a where or why or "what it exists as"
I am not arguing against it, I'm asking how it is, and what it is.
Where does the speed of light exist?
In the speed of light.
That's not a where
It exists in light.
No it doesn't
The speed of light has nothing to do with light itself
So the speed of light does not exist in the speed of light?
Then it's just a number.
A concept.
It is a characteristic of the fabric of spacetime
If it is a characteristic then it exists within what it is a characteristic of.
Are you now saying that Morality is a characteristic of Objective Morality?
I'm not quite sure where we are.
Speed of light is a characteristic of everything and their relation to each other. There is no where.
It is a characteristic of nothing too
So it is every*where*?
And there is no such thing as nothingness.
Unless there is, but then we wouldn't know about it.
It is a fundamental aspect of the universes existence itself.
Nothing is the lack of existence.
To say it exists is a paradox.
If you made a void in the universe itself with nothing in it you would still have spacetime itself that governs the speed of light.
No, nothing is no thing, not a single thing.
If you created a void it would be a void.
Speed is something.
Speed is a concept
If something exists in nothing, it is not nothingness.
It doesn't exist per se
Not even a concept could exist in nothing.
Nothing is nothing.
Unfathomable.
Still, this is irrelevant.
What?
I want to know what is the objective morality that our morality is allegedly based upon.