You have to define things to debate

None of which you have done.

You haven't told me how it exists, why it exists, when it came to exist, where it exists, what it exists as.

Only said it does

Which is faith.

Which apparently is an opinion m

Wtf? Most of those questions don't apply to morality at all

And opinions are not facts.

The relate to the existence of this "objective" morality.

Whatever that is.

And that is what we are talking about, not morality itself.

But the existence of an objective reality.

That was the question

What? Are you treating morality as an object?

Is morality objective, or subjective?

You said objective, so that means it exists.

Which means there is a way to validate the facts surrounding it.

A concept can not be objective.

Yeah things can exist without a where or why or "what it exists as"

I am not arguing against it, I'm asking how it is, and what it is.

Where does the speed of light exist?

In the speed of light.

That's not a where

It exists in light.

No it doesn't

The speed of light has nothing to do with light itself

So the speed of light does not exist in the speed of light?

Then it's just a number.

A concept.

It is a characteristic of the fabric of spacetime

If it is a characteristic then it exists within what it is a characteristic of.

Are you now saying that Morality is a characteristic of Objective Morality?

I'm not quite sure where we are.

Speed of light is a characteristic of everything and their relation to each other. There is no where.

It is a characteristic of nothing too

So it is every*where*?

And there is no such thing as nothingness.

Unless there is, but then we wouldn't know about it.

It is a fundamental aspect of the universes existence itself.

Nothing is the lack of existence.

To say it exists is a paradox.