Message from @Summī Imperator, 呪い殿
Discord ID: 487390223676997652
Ideally it shouldn't be a "who". There should be some standard which determines what is justification
But that's not how the Courts work.
Because humans aren't capable of attaining perfect objectivity
Should we do away with the courts and have a paper run them instead?
What?
Who would write this Mystical document that would enforce right and wrong and not be subjected to any interpretation?
How would that be enforced?
What would enforce it?
This has nothing to do with the morality and justification of a thing, you are asking questions of application
And I never mentioned a document
I'm asking how is there a definite morality.
No you weren't
Yes, I was.
If there is an objective morality, what is it?
You asked about a document that would enforce the morality. Not how morality is definite
Holy, sweet Lord, give me strength.
A document would be the application of the morality
I asked those questions because you said it should not be a "who" that decides what is Just
Which implies it should be a what.
A paper is written by a who
That is a philosophical question
No, it is a question that directly relates to your *opinion* that there is an objective morality.
That there is one morality that presides all others.
And takes precedence.
I'm asking what it is, and how is it free from interpretation?
We should be able to logically deduce the objective morality, which is a question of philosophy.
Unfortunately, humans are not perfectly logical creatures. We cannot achieve perfect objectivity in our moral systems.
Morality is not logical as there is no system to validate what is moral, and immoral.
I already provided two: natural rights and evolutionary psychology
So, morality is a human concept, and as such you have argued against yourself in saying that humanity can never reach an objective morality, meaning it does not exist.
When did I say that?
Hmmm, "We cannot achieve perfect objectivity in our moral systems."
Because "humans are not perfectly logical creatures."
I already addressed this too, objective morality is the foundation for our moral systems
There is no objective morality.
There are no facts of it.
Nothing that proves it is.
There is only your opinion.
I have given standards to validate it
You dodged all my questions on the subjects of what is more right, and how it righteousness is dictated.