Civic or ethno?

I'm presuming ethno

Well, eh

That could be unfair

Civic or ethno nationalist, shen?

I’m an ethno nationalist, but economically I’m left wing.

Like

Communist left-wing?

Strasser was baste

Depends on what you mean by "ethno-nationalist", but I am more sympathetic to foreigners that share my belief system over those that do not.

The problem there, is that few foreigners would align with me in comparison to my own.

But, I'll just forward what I was saying anyways

I dont know if I would call myself an ethno-nationalist

Does your nationalism extend to migrants who are patriotic in the nation

or is it based on "blood and soil"?

Or something akin to that

but for the sake of this conversation, let's just say I am

or "a shared heritage"

Alright, well, ethno-nationalism (and generally the beliefs surrounding it), contradict my own ideals

Well, the thing is few migrants are patriotic to the nation

And contrast what would support my personal best interests...

I mean, hostility towards migrants tends to do that

Are they ever at fault?

Or are they always victims?

The mere act of being a migrant doesn't place one at fault, no

lol

Who let them in?

Who passed legislation against discrimination

It varies depending on which group you mean

And even then, societal attitudes differ

For instance, America conquered much of its southern and western territories from Mexico - there wasn't migration, and thus, any who lingered from that time, staying in their place of birth were already here, and thus, face discrimination for no reason more or less

But of course, in the case of actual migrants

Generally free will - Governmental programs needed to help the states (like the Braceros program) - An economically forced migration north (As in, crushing poverty, possibly starvation, and minimal healthcare if one chooses to remain in an area) - Or just deciding to move anyways

While migrating to another nation isn't a right (the whole concept of rights are abstract/made up anyways, but that's the case with most things, like borders, or the very state itself), freedom of movement independent of birth status is an ethic nearly universally held

However, just because a government permits some migration doesn't mean society holds equally tolerant attitudes

Alright, so they're never victims no matter what they do.

*they're always

No?

How do you take that away from what I'm saying?

Because that was what you were asked

"Are they ever at fault?"

"Who let them in?"