still why send things to obama and hillary, its obvious those would be screened

Layers and layers of security between them

there was no chance of this plan actually working

Because mentally ill people tend to not have fully fleshed out plans, especially when they're acting out of rage?

we have an example of attempted assasinations

Such as
a) he used pipe bombs, which can easily explode by friction and none of them exploded while someone carried them
b) Pipe bombs generally use timers, and there is no way he knew what time to set when he dispatched 11-13 of those boxes
c) His personal facebook page contains almost all posts that are political, and there are little personal posts, though it carries his face
d) He somehow knew addresses of all these people
e) It occurred exactly after the Ricin incident

Perhaps there were precautions taken because he didn't want it to blow up in his hands

Just saying

interestingly enough they most often do, they arent usualyl retarded and do take autistic levels of planning. I now have some experience with them and its disturbing. They are retarded in social ways though.

cant read emotions all that

There is no way that it does not blow up when you have it and does when others have it. Do you know how pipe bombs work?

you have to be pretty bad at building bombs for them to just randomly explode

but IQ wise, usually very intelligent

Autistic =/= whatever the fuck he's got

Mental illness, believe it or not, is a legitimate issue and isn't hinged entirely on a single trait

Its not hard to make a bomg that blows up from carrying it, or bumbping around, as mentioned before speed bumbs stop terrorist attacks by causign the bomb to detonate early.

While you might know people like that, there's plenty of other types of mental illness, often more impulsive and violent

One did in Stockholm bombings

I dont know them, i have experience with them as in ive listened to and shadowed psychiatric interviews with them.

Also, you're presuming...

Pipe bombs can be ignited by static friction

okay, well whatever, you get what I'm saying

the impulsive na dviolent would use guns and go gunning, basically school shotoers

either way this is details

But anyways, you're presuming that someone who's a radical isn't inherently going to be incredibly political

guy is mentally insane

we agree

mentally insane and a radical right winger

there

He acted impulsively in a fit of hatred to attack what he viewed as enemies of the state/traitors

He's not representative of all right wingers

He's just a single, crazy lone wolf

Impulsively made so many bombs? I still don't think that is true

Eh, impulsively isn't the right word

He was radicalized, I suppose

Would be better to say

Kinda like that bastard in Charlottesvile

They're both radicals...

I still think its a false flag, its just too perfect, the timing and all, the execution, the fact that there were no losses of high end persons that there was not one succesful detonation. He didnt personally involve himself either directly to ensure his plan would succeed, somethign that is typical of an actual attack, assasinations etc. A legitimate usualyl attempt makes sure the plan works at least in one step. Much like say boston bombings.

and you might see it that way but generally speaking the media is painting it as something completely different, itll be that way for the future.

I mean, the bombs were working

That is, they would've if not for them being detected