only weak ones who dont understand the nature of christ do.

Morals are of great importance, if need be one should be willing to die for their’s.

I agree, but let me play devils advocate @Deleted User

Would it be better to hide your morals in time of desperation and regroup later?

Such as pretending to be a cuck during war and wait until the right moment to strike

I don’t believe so I rather think that it is better to stand by your morals with the utmost conviction.

This then shows others who share your morals or views that they are not alone.

This invigorates others which would be more so complacent than they should be.

I'm think along the lines of Napoleon, being exiled but coming back with a vengeance.

Be bold and hold true to your ideals , but by being kicked out or fleeing you can come back and rally others to your cause

I'm just playing devils advocate man, I ain't a weak fag who's gonna roll over

But giving an inch to opposition will allow them to take a foot.

If they take a foot now, we could gain a mile later.

Oh it’s all good man I too often play devil’s advocate because it is sometimes good to do so.

But if that extra mile isn’t guaranteed than a grave error could occur.

I think its nessesarry because while we al agree, if we dont argue opposing or contradicting points, we will be unable to debate when nessesarry

Ah but if that mile is assured as a victory, would it not be advantageous to wait to strike?

Don't retreat, just advance in the opposite direction.

Yes the devil’s advocate is an essential role.
And I must get some sleep, though I wish to leave you with this:
What if the enemy knows this and prepares accordingly or plays you like a fool by only making it seem the mile is assured when really they hold it in a grip stronger than any iron vice could?

I'll PM a response

I'd like to use California as an example for this, the decadence and degeneracy caused makes many sane individuals leave. Gun rights are being removed every election year by them, but I am certain that by allowing this to happen, a great show of force by ex Californians would wake the general public up. A massive March with armed civilians storming the capital and other prominent places.

by allowing this inch, we could almost certainly gain a mile.

Are you forgetting California is a US state

California is a liberal dictatorship

But if those armed civilians would have ran out the filth and degenerates then they may have maintained power long enough to avoid this from ever happening in the first place.

@everyone Daily Question 🔖
When did the Ottomans begin to decline? And when did it start to fall apart?

shutup idiot dumb head gay retard

1987

Inb4 some zoomer retard says 1683 and WW1

Who cares about the ottomans?

they're all gays

ww1

Did the ottomans really decline?

they couldn't keep up with modresation

1683 and ww1

when they stopped their nomadic lifestyle and adopted inferior and """civilised"""settle degeneracy

I think they reached their peak when Suleyman died and they platued, started to slowly decline until Napoleon invaded Egypt, in. 1798. Then, they fell apart rapidly and by 1914 the had lost Algiers, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt and almost all of their Balkan Territory

they would still be there if they turned all the cities they come across into mountain of rubble and skulls, farmland into grass land to feed their horses

From my EU knowledge they declined when the new world was discovered and they didnt get a piece of the pie

They missed that opportunity. In EU4, they can colonize Africa and Indonesia, but it takes time as you need to conquer the Mamluks to even start

Unless you attack Fezzan and move south