?????

The social contract doesn't exist

a voluntary assertion of force by own group onto another sounds pretty voluntary

Hahahaha

you broke the NAP by having something that I wanted

I rape someone,i make the voluntary decision to rape them theirfore its voluntary

if you had more force, it was clearly voluntary rape

for one of you

the one with more force

and thus one could argue that the person who had less force became less than person

so

That's egoist "anarchy"

thats not anarchy ,thats just self aware statism

🤔

nah, I think it is anarchy because my force has free will

Hahahahahaha

"I think it is anarchy"

look up anarcho capitalism

>asserting your definition of anarchy over another
that doesn't sound very voluntary
I didn't sign this social contract

Ur fucking with me

me?
never

I dont believe your this stupid,your trolling me

pssh, no

I'm definitely not a neo-reactionary fascist

i believe what he is saying

is that true anarchy was tried

and after a very long time this was the result 🤔

anarchy creates a power vacuum which will inevitably be filled

|<:GWcentralWowDess:377110520819613696>

https://youtu.be/yQeHjRs6QTs

ofc it will

it's already failing in eastern europe

slavs will never give in

Did you watch the video?

What if you have an AI
smarter than any human to ever walk this Earth
but it believes in Christianity
so
It believes it has no soul
and that it will eventually perish with the world
meaning it will suffer an eternity of nonexistence 100% guaranteed
what do you think would happen?

I think it’s too hypothetical to care

@Lotus Calme it would do everything it could to extend its existence. Maybe it would go insane with jealousy, and try to turn people away from Christianity.

@Lotus Calme humans still would have to create such a thing making us the most dangerous by far

"The state only causes suffering; it is a necessary by-product of it's function as it relies on the illegitimate use of violence. 'humanity's greatest pastime'...war , is a natural by-product of the state apparatus, it thrives of it as it can direct all the hatred and angst to a singular enemy and as a result increase the state's power as the people are too ditracted to argue. The state craves an enemy and this is exemplified in wartime. The state craves war"

Thoughts?