and fallen

what is your point?

so has everything

Know what you're saying is is to allow foreign spiritualities to take over I don't think you're being practical in any way whatsoever

You are merely setting up the ability for Christianity to be subverted

Christianity was once a foreign religion from the Jewish people lmao

But was eventually adapted to suit the Romans

`foreign spiritualities`

for a guy using a popes name you don’t seem too faithful

Do you think you live in a vacuum where there is Christianity or Nothing at All.... I think you should look at the globe and see what's happening my friend

I am a protestant

Good

ahahahaha

It's time to stop being stupid

I see you haven't joined the Catholic cult

I use this pfp to make fun of sede's

I was a catholic

and pretending to be naive about these thought experiments were Christianity just goes away on its own and become something else in a vacuum without influence from foreign influence

This idiocy has led us to where we are now

John Locke was a fool

Imagine a world without Christianity

no he wasn't

@Deleted User

I dont think you're understanding. I'm not even implying it is either Christianity or nothing. I'm saying that as traditionalists we should know that traditionalism doesnt advocate for the holding onto of dead or dying values. Traditionalism does very much allow us to go forward and leave the past behind but in ways that are socially necessary and organic

He founded the fucking country your in RN

no he didn’t

Locke led to the USA

his theories are almost perfectly implemented in 1789

Try reading John Locke he's a Pie in the Sky Fantasy having philosopher totally untethered to reality totally ungrounded to the defensive nature that Western Civilization needed to have completely divorced from geopolitics and reality

with the writing of the consitutions

that’s like saying marx founded the ussr

You know what he meant

His pretty little rationalizations... Have shown themselves to be nonsensical in the modern world

And only barely made sense in the homogeneous states that he lived in in his time

yeah i knew what he meant and i said it’s wrong

Lmao

I can grant that he could not have foreseen multiculturalism but now we have seen it so we can't be so stupid

The problem with Lockeanism is that its state of nature never existed nor could ever exist

Social contract theory is big gay

why

Right