https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NEqlfWSOrQ

yeahhhh

I'm not watching a video, already short on time

as I said like 5 minutes ago

I do need to leave

I'll be back later tonight

or tomorrow, maybe

who knows

whenever I feel like coming back

we can continue then

Or you can never come back, if you do choose to come back, leave your *implicit bias* behind

You have an implicit bias against facts u are bigoted

"My limited entertainment from this is gone"
Well it seems they weren't being too serious about this

When, long ago, the gods created Earth
in Jove's fair image. Man was shaped at birth.
The beasts for lesser parts were next designed;
Yet were they too remote from humankind.
To fill the gap, and join the rest of man,
Th'Olympian host conceiv'd a clever plan.
A beast they wrought, in semi-human figure,
Filled it with vice, and called the thing a Nigger.
- H.P. Lovecraft

oof

If me and a man are doing equal work and performing at the same level with no variants I expect equal pay and treatment, but that’s not the world we live in and paying one person more just to “equal out the wage” is stupid.

It's almost *never* the case that they are doing the exact equal work

^

And there’s nothing the federal government could do even if it were an issue on a huge scale

Without impeding too much on other things

Then I hear

Muh equity

Equality is a myth

Equity=fairness right?

I mean

I'm not that serious about it

what I said is what I believe, but I'm not, y'know

devoted to some argument on the internet

also, the thing is

Equity is a component of justice, isn't it?

regarding discrimination/unequal pay...

a lot of that "unequal pay" comes from women being passed up for promotions, even in equal situations

as blind studies with traditionally masculine/traditionally feminine names on the same resume have shown

What do you think about this -
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-science-gender-idUSKBN0N421420150413?irpc=932

I haven’t looked at the story yet^
But even if the test was good and the info is right one industry isn’t enough to say anything is a widespread issue

so what I think of it is that it’s wrong and the women shouldn’t be preferred to male applicants

The point is that to me, it looks like you are trying to use state or societal power to control what normally people do, for something of which there will always be sparse evidence. It is neither prudent nor just.

ah

I was going off of the 2012 study

this is stem, so I'd presume that due to efforts to get more women into stem as of late

that there'd be more of a preference to fill in that discrepancy