Message from @Doctor Anon

Discord ID: 487780411624259584


2018-09-08 00:22:32 UTC  

not the entire US National Guard

2018-09-08 00:22:48 UTC  

Hire a patrol that patrols the border patrol.

2018-09-08 00:22:51 UTC  

@Summī Imperator, 呪い殿 i guess so, the militia part would be to ease off tension and make it look like the people want it

2018-09-08 00:23:08 UTC  

@Summī Imperator, 呪い殿 I would on my off time, for free.

2018-09-08 00:23:16 UTC  

a lack of communications, or even sloppy mistakes could lead to skirmishes

2018-09-08 00:23:20 UTC  

Just use the military, they're there to protect the National interests

2018-09-08 00:23:22 UTC  

who would train these militias?

2018-09-08 00:23:32 UTC  

So put them to work actually protecting that interest.

2018-09-08 00:23:36 UTC  

Militias are for show you @Deleted User

2018-09-08 00:23:47 UTC  

then?....

2018-09-08 00:23:50 UTC  

The military would be the ones actually guarding it

2018-09-08 00:24:00 UTC  

Rather than invading Nations that don't support the US Petro dollar.

2018-09-08 00:24:10 UTC  

what's the point of militias if they do nothing?

2018-09-08 00:24:20 UTC  

That's a guise.

2018-09-08 00:24:28 UTC  

@Deleted User It's symbolic, just like the wall.

2018-09-08 00:24:37 UTC  

@Hum wrong

2018-09-08 00:24:42 UTC  

To show there are people who support it that aren't ordered to.

2018-09-08 00:24:54 UTC  

Correct me, then.

2018-09-08 00:24:59 UTC  

Walls a proven to reduce illegal immigration dramatically

2018-09-08 00:25:04 UTC  

Basically it is for morale support.

2018-09-08 00:25:12 UTC  
2018-09-08 00:25:14 UTC  

read above

2018-09-08 00:25:30 UTC  

militias mainly focus on drug caravans anyway, if several groups of migrants came at once, the militias could only focus on 1 at a time, most likely the one known to be carrying illegal subtances

2018-09-08 00:25:59 UTC  

The militia.

2018-09-08 00:26:20 UTC  

The Wall is a deterrent

2018-09-08 00:26:25 UTC  

Like I said earlier.

2018-09-08 00:26:43 UTC  

it would stop 70% at the first few months, eventually some will say fuck it and try another way

2018-09-08 00:27:39 UTC  

There are tunnel diggers and stuff.

2018-09-08 00:27:46 UTC  

^

2018-09-08 00:27:49 UTC  

But that's difficult and expensive.

2018-09-08 00:27:51 UTC  

via boat

2018-09-08 00:27:52 UTC  

@Deleted User Here's my ultimate solution mate: A border wall with the military permanently stationed there, that has authority to shoot anyone trying to cross into the U.S legally. @Deleted User There is no research to support that ever has or ever will happen, on the contrary walls are proven to reduce immigration by up to 70% *forever*, it only goes back up by 2-3% after a few *years*.

2018-09-08 00:28:00 UTC  

And can only allow so many at a time.

2018-09-08 00:28:12 UTC  

@Deleted User are you retarded, the national guard already patrols the waters, almost no one uses water ways

2018-09-08 00:28:20 UTC  

You wouldn't be able to make a big tunnel and have it go unnoticed for very long.

2018-09-08 00:28:36 UTC  

@Summī Imperator, 呪い殿 U.S already deploys tech to detect tunnels

2018-09-08 00:28:38 UTC  

I was just syaing it was an option, you never know, it's not like the US military is impenetrable, it has taken losses before

2018-09-08 00:28:53 UTC  

@Deleted User It cant lose on it's own soil

2018-09-08 00:28:57 UTC  

Yeah, of course they do.

2018-09-08 00:28:58 UTC  

it has

2018-09-08 00:29:06 UTC  

It's never lost a battle on it's own soil