Message from @SilverLining
Discord ID: 488237437244669953
@SilverLining You quotemined him
I just clicked on your link
"We have found they are far from perfectly correlated"
is not the same thing as
"There is no correlation"
yeah i was going to say that or you fucking didn't read his conclusion correctly
You're doing what creationists like to do
That is not what he said
yes...
You literally just proved yourself wrong and don't even realize it
so a weak correlation at best
yay i dont have to go through this lonng ass document
also, presuming this is still true, you're neglecting the fact that IQ itself is strongly correlated with a number of abiological factors
you are just a idiot
like every other Bolshevik
@SilverLining I'm gathering articles
Give me a few minutes
He was suggesting intelligence wasn't the only thing that determined later in life success
Not that it was poorly correlated
eh
my bad for not remembering the study perfectly
IQ isn't the only, or largest predictor
well yes even a retard get become filithy rich
see: the 45th president of the united states
because todays society is fucked
yay inheritance
anyhow
Beyond IQ not being the largest predictor
it's also not useful in determining intelligence
as there's a myriad of types of intelligence
see: all mainstream actors, artists, etc...
going by gardner...
musical-rhythmic,
visual-spatial,
verbal-linguistic,
logical-mathematical,
bodily-kinesthetic,
interpersonal,
intrapersonal, and
naturalistic.
Here's some, I'm reading some others
yes a retard turns 1 million into 10 billion
ok
oh wait
I found a new york times article about it, but it dances around the IQ thing, just pointing out that other factors exist
It doesn't really have any information in it of substance