Message from @Default™
Discord ID: 488237043990921227
Granted one was a little fishy, so Iguess that doesn't count
And report back to me with what you found the conclusions were
so I have two other people to go look
but i guess i will do it
"ignore the actual study, use other sources"
@SilverLining You quotemined him
I just clicked on your link
"We have found they are far from perfectly correlated"
is not the same thing as
"There is no correlation"
yeah i was going to say that or you fucking didn't read his conclusion correctly
You're doing what creationists like to do
That is not what he said
yes...
You literally just proved yourself wrong and don't even realize it
so a weak correlation at best
yay i dont have to go through this lonng ass document
also, presuming this is still true, you're neglecting the fact that IQ itself is strongly correlated with a number of abiological factors
you are just a idiot
@SilverLining I'm gathering articles
Give me a few minutes
He was suggesting intelligence wasn't the only thing that determined later in life success
Not that it was poorly correlated
eh
slightly off, then
my bad for not remembering the study perfectly
IQ isn't the only, or largest predictor
well yes even a retard get become filithy rich
see: the 45th president of the united states
because todays society is fucked
yay inheritance
anyhow
Beyond IQ not being the largest predictor
it's also not useful in determining intelligence
as there's a myriad of types of intelligence
see: all mainstream actors, artists, etc...
going by gardner...
musical-rhythmic,
visual-spatial,
verbal-linguistic,
logical-mathematical,
bodily-kinesthetic,
interpersonal,
intrapersonal, and
naturalistic.