Message from @Doctor Anon
Discord ID: 492867539504726017
Second, and on to my next point, before you respond @SilverLining
eh, touche
@SilverLining though I'd remove plutonium or uranium nuclear power
I'm not saying it is viable on large scales
I mean, you were arguing against me, relying on strictly the source interpretation
and now you're trying to say that your interpretation is right
So we're both in the wrong, I suppose.
I'm saying that you made a poor comparison, because it widely depends on the source
The Netherlands has the most accepting society in the world in regards to its treatment of homosexuals, surely, even if, even if they grew up in bad times, we would see a stronger trend downward @SilverLining
Nuclear is dirty
Because you need mines
"Twelve years of same-sex marriage did not wipe out homophobia from society. For instance, Yunus, now 9, and his adoptive mothers had to go into hiding, fearing for their safety.
Bullying and victimisation also still occurs on a daily basis. A recent study by Dutch and American scientists concluded that lesbian, gay and bisexual youths are still victims of stigmatisation in their families, schools and neighbourhoods."
And mines need tailings ponds
I forgot which element it was, think it's thorium, but produces several time more energy for 1/100 the waste
@SilverLining Unlike you, I'm leaving room for you to give your own interpretation
more accepting, sure. That doesn't mean entirely.
Okay, cool.
Not outright denying it
Tailings ponds are often overlooked construction wise.
This is dishonest debating
Gotcha
And you can not choose where a uranium deposit is.
@Summī Imperator, 呪い殿 T H O R I U M
Y'know what
So if it is in an area near water, but you have the energy demand
Fuck it
Anarcho-primitivism.
I'll link you a video hold up
Fuck all energy.
Do you sacrifice the power, or the water?
And thorium is not viable because it burns too hot.
Let's use farm animals to power everything.
And can not be contained with our current tech.
Also China is buying up a lot of the patents on thorium.
Watch above
yeah, but like
@SilverLining
"I mean, you were arguing against me, relying on strictly the source interpretation"
In that debate I gave you room for you to interpret the data your way, that is just not true, I only said that you were claiming the author stated something he did not
Imagine a ton of horses walking in a circle to power major urban centers.