And thorium is even rarer than uranium and comes with the same problems.

@Summī Imperator, 呪い殿 no?

Also I don't watch videos, because I'm on data

Okay, cool, so I'm not taking some online debates super seriously

you got me

Well you have to mine thorium.

You come across as if you want to, which is the problem

@SilverLining it's <#452955229227319306> for a reason

Mines need tailings ponds

It's a discord server

@Summī Imperator, 呪い殿 it's nothing compared to the energy produced

@SilverLining Dosen't matter <#452955229227319306> is for... Serious debates

Featuring 2 people with weeby avatars, some tehocrat, and a guy with a dog picture as an avatar

So again, of you found a way to utilize thorium without it melting your facility.

I'm not being terribly off the walls rn

I'm just not really

Would you sacrifice energy, or water of you found a large source?

Putting in much effort to remain consistent or anything

Thorium can't overheat a facility

I'm literally only here to fuck around

Well to my knowledge the reason we do not use it is because it is ridiculously difficult to contain for prolonged periods

but yeah

Take the eco-fascist pill

fucking cucks

I would agree though, it does have a lot of energy potential

Turn off the computer

Turn off the TV

Live in the woods

And if you could manage to contain it, which is the issue, it might be useful.

But where do you place the risk?

Society really peaked in 731 if you think about it.

*1946

@Summī Imperator, 呪い殿 you don't need to contain it

It can't overreact on its own

1946 was pretty damn good, too.

What? It melts everything by heat

So...

Any year we get to execute nazis is a good year, y'know?

1946 was good because Peron @SilverLining

How do you utilize the energy without containing it?

Ah, I'm thinking Nuremberg.