Socialism

It is obviously not Capitalist

Nor Communist]

It's something between them

it's in between in the direction of the dialectic

but it's not a syncretism

it's a detachment from capitalism

Andhgilghlgu;yhgo8igujhpiohioihjihuj9iohj]]

@Koninos there is nothing shared by capitalism with socialism

eh

@Koninos name one thing shared

White people.

I mean

Sort of

Democracy is dangerous to competent statecraft because it forces every political decision to be lowered to a level of stupidity that the masses can understand.

That's great and all but the proclaimed idyllic evil that statists claim of democracy only happens if the democracy captures the national level

a grand state should not be relied upon to deliver judgement in every local issue

@Doctor Anon

there is no reason a locale should not hold elections and plan itself as a community

I thought I clicked in chat, nvmd

@Koninos Communism is basically Socialism through revolution

They are the same

Not at all.

Here a huge differences between Communism and Socialism.

there is some material differences

there isn't the ability to dissolve a state under material conditions that allow a free association of producers under socialism

but it is the goal

Generally i see compromised solution. Since as someone above stated that the state cannot reasonably control and maintain and manage small local communities spread out over thousaof square kilometers. Rather we need small local rings.

I have the idea of a concentric republic. The ruling class has to be accountable and held accountabel by even the lowest class. once upon a time this meant that if things were going poorly assasinations and or rebellions would start. However that breeds instability.

If we were to have local senates that decide locla matters and elect from each other another senator that goes up to represent the locals in a regional senate, these then elect another to represent the region in the national senate. This has a ctach, that catch is that these representatives always answer to people beneath them, meaning that it is ultimately the people that control the senate and that the job is never one that is secure and greatly incetivises actually representing the interests of the people. This of course will induce some natural selection. The cream will always rise ot the top, and corrupting the entire system becomes impossible and also incentivises political activity by the men regardless of their class.

Socialism, Communism, Social Democracy

It's all the same

All of it is retarded

goys this showed up recently near my uni after the recent elections

ebic

super gay WP sign though

@Bolshevik Eliminator you’re not entirely right

i agree social democrats are fags

along with the majority of communists

all communists are fags

no exceptions