Message from @The Big Oof

Discord ID: 510954240806748160


2018-11-10 21:46:32 UTC  

Meritocracy does not exist. It is a fool's search

2018-11-10 21:46:33 UTC  

In meritocracy, rich people are the leaders

2018-11-10 21:46:35 UTC  

Aristocracy is stupid as well

2018-11-10 21:46:59 UTC  

Aristocracy is genius

2018-11-10 21:47:25 UTC  

ya'll stoopid, bring back Mesopotamian city-states 😤

2018-11-10 21:47:42 UTC  

It protects us from incompetent leaders

2018-11-10 21:48:01 UTC  

not neccessarily, some shit could still go down

2018-11-10 21:48:10 UTC  

In aristocracy?

2018-11-10 21:48:46 UTC  

aristocracy is the one where a group of powerful people elect a leader right?

2018-11-10 21:49:55 UTC  

shalom?

2018-11-10 21:55:36 UTC  

Wait so who is president now

2018-11-10 23:07:10 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/452955229227319306/510953597970677760/12.PNG

2018-11-10 23:07:18 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/452955229227319306/510953629428088855/23.PNG

2018-11-10 23:07:25 UTC  

Discuss

2018-11-10 23:08:11 UTC  

discuss

2018-11-10 23:08:56 UTC  

Yes, check this out

2018-11-10 23:08:57 UTC  

I'm convinced you are a troll, but in the event you aren't, I'll just drop these here since you're going on about it in this channel already

2018-11-10 23:09:13 UTC  

It is where he said that I was saying it after posting the screenshot and then changed to I was thinking it

2018-11-10 23:09:44 UTC  

So you vocalized your position but didn't actually think it?

2018-11-10 23:10:07 UTC  

how else is this to be interpreted

2018-11-10 23:10:25 UTC  

Did I vocalise it? You said yes. Waiting for proof

2018-11-10 23:10:56 UTC  

My bad, you typed it out. Your position there was that welfare and taxes don't exist in free markets, and you used the austrian school as proof

2018-11-10 23:11:10 UTC  

I didn't type it too. Try again

2018-11-10 23:11:32 UTC  

Please remember your script

2018-11-10 23:11:53 UTC  

I honestly can't tell if you're trolling or not. I really can't

2018-11-10 23:12:08 UTC  

You can show the exact quote mate.

2018-11-10 23:12:15 UTC  

which I did

2018-11-10 23:12:22 UTC  

No. The sentences differ.

2018-11-10 23:12:55 UTC  

You acknowledged that "even if he did not think that"

2018-11-10 23:13:24 UTC  

"Even if he did not think that" meaning "even if he didn't think friedman was in the austrian school"

2018-11-10 23:13:43 UTC  

Did I type that he was in Austrian School? Yes or No?

2018-11-10 23:14:13 UTC  

"Even if you didn't think that and unintentionally said it, or it looked like you said it due to word placement"

2018-11-10 23:14:28 UTC  

Please answer. You said here that I typed it.

2018-11-10 23:14:43 UTC  

"You think free markets can have taxes and welfare? Thanks for being against the proponents of free markets"
"You think free markets can have taxes and welfare? Try telling that to the Austrian school and Chicago boys"

Did you or did you not say that?

2018-11-10 23:15:02 UTC  

why are we still doing this

2018-11-10 23:15:08 UTC  

i dont know

2018-11-10 23:15:09 UTC  

draco is not bright enough to have discourse

2018-11-10 23:15:11 UTC  

Why you are changing the quote?

2018-11-10 23:15:13 UTC  

I mean i agree not everyone should vote however the lack of wisdom is moreso an effect that the effort needed to have the right to vote is so low, the harder one needs to work to aqquire such a right the more interested and the more one thinks about politics and its impact, who he casts the vote to and is more ready to do something. Giving the vote to everyone for simply existing and aggreing to a terms of service is pathetic and reduces the value and the pressure of even being interested in politics and thinking. It makes voting something benign and to be thrown away. However reducing the people that can vote and increasing criteria to be able to vote is and must be the way we go. You cannot thus give away the vote to everyone nor can you restrict it, both systems produce an equally terrible and unstable result.