Message from @The Big Oof
Discord ID: 510954240806748160
Meritocracy does not exist. It is a fool's search
In meritocracy, rich people are the leaders
Aristocracy is stupid as well
Aristocracy is genius
ya'll stoopid, bring back Mesopotamian city-states 😤
It protects us from incompetent leaders
not neccessarily, some shit could still go down
In aristocracy?
aristocracy is the one where a group of powerful people elect a leader right?
shalom?
Wait so who is president now
Discuss
discuss
Yes, check this out
I'm convinced you are a troll, but in the event you aren't, I'll just drop these here since you're going on about it in this channel already
It is where he said that I was saying it after posting the screenshot and then changed to I was thinking it
how else is this to be interpreted
Did I vocalise it? You said yes. Waiting for proof
My bad, you typed it out. Your position there was that welfare and taxes don't exist in free markets, and you used the austrian school as proof
I didn't type it too. Try again
Please remember your script
I honestly can't tell if you're trolling or not. I really can't
You can show the exact quote mate.
which I did
No. The sentences differ.
You acknowledged that "even if he did not think that"
"Even if he did not think that" meaning "even if he didn't think friedman was in the austrian school"
Did I type that he was in Austrian School? Yes or No?
"Even if you didn't think that and unintentionally said it, or it looked like you said it due to word placement"
Please answer. You said here that I typed it.
"You think free markets can have taxes and welfare? Thanks for being against the proponents of free markets"
"You think free markets can have taxes and welfare? Try telling that to the Austrian school and Chicago boys"
Did you or did you not say that?
why are we still doing this
i dont know
draco is not bright enough to have discourse
Why you are changing the quote?
I mean i agree not everyone should vote however the lack of wisdom is moreso an effect that the effort needed to have the right to vote is so low, the harder one needs to work to aqquire such a right the more interested and the more one thinks about politics and its impact, who he casts the vote to and is more ready to do something. Giving the vote to everyone for simply existing and aggreing to a terms of service is pathetic and reduces the value and the pressure of even being interested in politics and thinking. It makes voting something benign and to be thrown away. However reducing the people that can vote and increasing criteria to be able to vote is and must be the way we go. You cannot thus give away the vote to everyone nor can you restrict it, both systems produce an equally terrible and unstable result.