It's called I know that because it's what every other right winger says so it's gotta be true

if women are directly impacted by the policy and decision making by society, why should they not get to represent themselves in society's affairs?

Die Rote he's memeing

how about nobody gets to vote

im talking to doc

or rather

Hard to tell when he does that

the right to vote would be earned through service

wrong

"People who are apart of the nation should get a voice in it"

Most people work for self interest, let's be clear here

also

democracy is big gay and is nothing more than the rule of money

narratives win in democracy and not facts

democracy in community planning rewards self-interest

Democracy big gay

@PebbЛe voting out of self interest is big gay

Back

What'd I miss

democracy is good

everyone is equal

They're not registered for the draft

No equality until equal responsibility

>draft

sorry i believe in militia

based^

Women must be care takers

And mothers

yeah what part of `if women are directly impacted by the policy and decision making by society, why should they not get to represent themselves in society's affairs?` do you not understand

because women think emotionally

Because women don't deserve a say

Stop shitposting @PebbЛe

Granted this is high-effort shitposting

voting should not be a right, it should be a privilege

why dont women deserve a say

yuo rely on them to be caretakers and nurturers

Their husbands can vote for their inetrests

in a society wherein women are barred from voting it is based on notions that their interests aren't necessary, their husbands wouldn't do shit

Sucks to be inferior then 😎

@Silkiri You misrepresented what im talking about. There is a difference between being politically active and interested and voting. There is a difference between voting without influence and voting with influence. The fact more women vote (I knew this before I made the statement)

Literally women follow, this is and always has been how the sexes function. So when I say that women take on the vote of their husband the vast majority of the time, it is most likely true. If I say 90% of women are not active in public discussion on politics and politics are not an active topic in their circles. This is something that anybody that has ever been near women or evesdropped on their discussions knows. Women usually consider politics a waste of time and never get invested usually using muh feels and simply tossing the vote around just because.

Also to say women get affected so they should be able to vote, thats not true. If we take the stance that not everyone gets the right to vote then women most of the time would never take the time or make the effort ot get the right as in their eyes its just something they have and its worthless. It also completely disregards what marriages were and are, what relationships were and are and how intensly this would then actually make women active in politics and how men would also listen to women more as a woman is the person that knows best what is happening in the house etc.

The children are then prioritised etc.

Does involvement mena that they know what they are talking about or know anything on te topic? No. This is simple manipulation much like the freedom cigs campeign to get women to vote. Literally aplay on female emotions and suddenly most women are smoking. Now since it is beyond evident that women are emtional thinkers and are esily manipulated emotionally, we cna conclude that in recent years women have been motivated non stop to vote based purely on emotion. And they vote on emotion often voting primarily for those that posit benefits for them as the female group. menaing nanny govorment etc. In order to replace men in their lives. Ironically this "independance" is used then to manufacture the male patriarchal figure just in the form of a massive nanny state.