@Silkiri You misrepresented what im talking about. There is a difference between being politically active and interested and voting. There is a difference between voting without influence and voting with influence. The fact more women vote (I knew this before I made the statement)
Literally women follow, this is and always has been how the sexes function. So when I say that women take on the vote of their husband the vast majority of the time, it is most likely true. If I say 90% of women are not active in public discussion on politics and politics are not an active topic in their circles. This is something that anybody that has ever been near women or evesdropped on their discussions knows. Women usually consider politics a waste of time and never get invested usually using muh feels and simply tossing the vote around just because.
Also to say women get affected so they should be able to vote, thats not true. If we take the stance that not everyone gets the right to vote then women most of the time would never take the time or make the effort ot get the right as in their eyes its just something they have and its worthless. It also completely disregards what marriages were and are, what relationships were and are and how intensly this would then actually make women active in politics and how men would also listen to women more as a woman is the person that knows best what is happening in the house etc.
