Deeplove if you think that was an actual argument

People need to stop thinking
National socialism = all of fascism

"Dysgenics (rarely cacogenics) is the study of factors producing the accumulation and perpetuation of defective or disadvantageous genes and traits in offspring of a particular population or species."

And?

It's the future parodied in the movie Idiocracy. The highly capable spend more time advancing humanity than reproducing, the underclass has nothing better to do

So this is your argument that entirely debunks the left wing.

In a framework that you might understand, yes

Gay.

why do you think a hereditary system is better than a meritocratic one? @DeepLove

Have fun when the dialectics come into play

when did I ever say I supported purely hereditary government?

I said I support eugenics and transcendentalism

did you not argue that it was preferable earlier?

aristocracy, rule of the nobility

that's a hereditary system

Also, do you think the nobles care about nationalism?

not exactly, it can be

and yes, because they are the nation

um, no they aren't

they live separate lives from everyone else

You live a separate life from everyone else

are we really arguing based on the lowest common denominator?

destroyed

"they live separate lives from everyone else"

"You live a separate life from everyone else"

Hardly even comparable. True to an extent, but it's disingenuous. Most people have more in common with me than they would with the "nobility."

Saying "yeah, well, you're different from other people to" is a nothing statement. It doesn't mean anything.

"are we really arguing based on the lowest common denominator?"

No, someone is pointing out how it makes no sense to be a nationalist and support the elites.

I support any policy that reduces the reproduction of the low IQ, the lazy, the incapable, the ugly. I support any policy that leads to more people with will-to-power, sharp mind, beauty and strength. I support any policy that leads the Overton window away from crass materialism. I support any policy that leads to public dialog and appreciation for transcending the lower qualities in any manifestation.

However these policies come about, that is the state I support. Democracy has failed in this aspect, for technical reasons, and cannot succeed given the conditions of the world today.

in other words youre stupid

Sure stumped me, friend.

Democracy is gay, yes, but I think we think it's gay for different reasons

Democracy is the rule of money, for one. Narratives win in elections instead of facts, and also many people just don't actively do the research on the candidates they support/oppose.

Dysgenics aren't caused by democracy itself, but rather by nihilism

which itself stems from an over-abundance over resources

It also empowers the lower classes by electing politicians to hand out gibs

and gives incentive for moving vast numbers of people into the state

that don't really contribute

@Pingu Checks and balances would exist, yes, but overall a strong government is preferable to a concept as nebulous as freedom

@DeepLove Oh, they do contribute, to wage reduction and cheap labor

That's done by businessmen and not the democratic system itself

generally speaking

removing democracy isn't going to solve that on its own

"gibs" aren't inherently bad on their own, it depends on what they are and why they are given

The Big H for a while paid workers to partake in leisurely activities