imagine adding more blood and small wounds

sometimes a high stakes to the death spectacle

i dont agree with to the death but that would be bringing back gladiators in the fullest

Right, gladiators fought to submission but there were frequent incidental deaths

the loser would usually be killed if he was maimed during the fight, sometimes by his own request

It depended if I remember correctly they had high risk and low risk fights, so anything from a boxing match to fights to the death.

it depended on how badly maimed he was, did he lose an arm, get stibbed in the lung. If he was dying anyways then it was simly mercy to finish him quickly. However if he was injured, broken boe, deep laceration, etc. then he was kept alive and usually sent to the nearest medical facility they had. Ancient medicine was actually pretty advanced tbh

for example trepenation of the skull wasnt done out of superstition or in random places, but rather in areas that were located or suspected to have hematomas. The clinical signs that are described and drawn are typical for sub arachnoid hemoorage. And honestly it had a decent success rate.

the ancients were even better versed in amputation and surgery than medieval persons

basically the medieval ages was the golden age for weapons and industrial tech, the ancient world was the best intellectual age, and now we have the best consumerist age

implying there's anything good about consumerism

true, I mean generally there isnt anything inherently good about any of the ages, just htat both medieval, reneissance, and ancient times had the greatest fruits

currently the fruit is degeneracy and conflict

One does not celebrate the death of a criminal for the same reason one does not celebrate flushing the toilet

It is perverse

But you do celebrate flushing the toilet lmao

are you telling me you don't cheer when you've been at it with the toilet plunger for ten minutes and it finally goes down

Yes

I am telling you that I don't cheer when I flush the toilet

What the heck is this conversation

^

"A Nationless-State no longer manages the affairs of the host nation, but is a government that lives off the nation’s labor and industrial accomplishments at the nation’s expense. It enslaves the nation, blames the nation and ultimately destroys the nation."

https://aryanrepublic.wordpress.com/2018/12/11/aryan-manifesto/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3613286/

read the cultural shift section, it literally explains the forces behind ruining traditional relationships

honestly the health proffesionals even tried to stop this, refusing to give solo women birth control

and good

Also reddit tried to debunk this, and in fact one redditor took it farther and found that it was even worse than this graph shows, which tries to argue for a conterintuitive data

in the adjusted proper graph the redditor made the lines basically go drastically up

with 10+ partners being as marriable as your local whore

@Bogatyr Bogumir 6-9 partners just as bad as having two

jesus

@The Big Oof When the guy adjusted it got even worse than having 2. This data includes a lot of extra data to make 9+ look not as bad.

also crushing degeneracy on other servers feels good

Gay

no u

no u

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread948855/pg1

☝️related info, lots of pics included

Ty for your post, @Bogatyr Bogumir

@Bogatyr Bogumir the real problem is ideologies like libertarianism where marriage is reduced to a contract and nothing else

theocracy is okay but let people leave

don't force people to live in your shithole state

Is it moral to torture criminals who have raped or killed?