I was interested to pick your brain, moreso

ok, then I'll ask specific questions

are you anti-semitic?

That's not an unfair assessment

not as antisemitic as some, sure, but most anyone would consider me so

do you buy kevin mcdonad's shit that I'm born evil?

I have yet to read MacDonald. I would not say you're intrinsically evil, though.

what makes jews evil then?

The mistake of some people in my realm of views is to apply the characterizations of "international Jews" to average Jews you may find in your neighborhood. It's undeniable that there are Jews who are in the upper-echelon of society. It's undeniable that Jews, being only 2% of the American population, are grossly overrepresented in the number of millionaires, billionaires, or general positions of influence (Hollywood, etc.). Applying what anyone with power does to those without power is dumb.

Going back to what started all of this (that whole thing with the Founding Fathers), John Jay's quote is very good, and quite Fascist in nature. That the United States government and people were made for each other. Jews do not fit this view, therefore their representation in the upper rungs of society is inherently wrong.

I'm gonna look up the quote

it's in the picture

I came into the convo later

bottom

this:

"Real Christians will abstain from violating the rights of others, and therefore will not provoke war. Almost all nations have peace or war at the will and pleasure of rulers whom they do not elect, and who are not always wise or virtuous. Providence has given to our people the choice of their rulers, and it is the duty, as well as the privilege and interest, of our Christian nation to select and prefer Christians for their rulers."[44] He also expressed a belief that the moral precepts of Christianity were necessary for good government, saying, "No human society has ever been able to maintain both order and freedom, both cohesiveness and liberty apart from the moral precepts of the Christian Religion. Should our Republic ever forget this fundamental precept of governance, we will then, be surely doomed.

You're reaching with the agreed upon application and interpretation of that quote

it was in a letter to another individual

he's not the only founding father

had the founding fathers, as a consensus , agreed with not only that quote, but your intepretation of it , it would've been condified into law that only christians can get elected

but even reading the quote, it doesn't necessarily mean that

it reads like a proposal at the strongest and advice at the weakest

nevermind, that it easily includes jews

`and it is the duty, as well as the privilege and interest, of our Christian nation to select and prefer Christians for their rulers."`

I see this as voting advice to the public

also

his justification for it

is this:

`"No human society has ever been able to maintain both order and freedom, both cohesiveness and liberty apart from the moral precepts of the Christian Religion.`

judaism is a minor religion ,statistically

and this wasn't a time when everyone kept saying "judeo-christian values"

Well, yeah, it certainly is advice. I'm not saying it's law.

I'm speaking to the philosophy behind it

but "the moral precepts of the Christian Religion." are almost surely from the old testament

jews satisfy that

also

this would preclude from electing atheist nonjewish whites

You're not taking this as I've meant it

yet, I'm sure that you'll argue

that the US shouldn't make attempts to deport white atheists

even though the advice is not to elect them