you cant box up free will in a definition, its too big for that with too many implications

Is there multiple possible outcomes?

yes

No

Always

How can there be if cause and effect exists

There isn’t room

theres plenty

What room is there?

The laws of the universe aren’t loose

They can’t be broken on our level

its very tight

to the point we are only able to break the "laws of physics" at the subatomic level

I don’t think that restricts free will

thats two completely different topics

one is philosphy one is physics

free will in the physical sense cant exist because nothing can exist without influencing factors

ok, lemme ask you a question. if a man with no moral experience for whatever reason was given a piece of paper. that had one question with four different answers about a moral question. which one would he chose?

Imossible

>if a man with no moral experience

its an important thought question

how is it important?

just try your best to answer it

its not a realistic question so it serves no realistic purpose

it doesnt have to be, its a thought question

so philosophy

whatever floats your boat

well it is statistically a 55% chance the correct option is"C"

if morals are arbitrary, then there is no right answer, he answers it as he sees it

He wouldn’t answer it

That’s what happens in a vacuum

ok for that to have validity you have to now find a man with no moral experiemce

i can rephrase the question to be more realistic

If there is no cause there will be no effect

the thought exercize itself is worthless as we have intrinsic values

we can only have intrinsic values if we have an outside entity to give us those

not true

instincts

if its food hed try to save it

instincts are not intrinsic nor are they values

if its an offspring hed try to save it