Message from @Josh42A
Discord ID: 456311960544477186
I’m not completely sure
the butterfly effect makes that completely impossible
you cant box up free will in a definition, its too big for that with too many implications
Is there multiple possible outcomes?
yes
No
Always
How can there be if cause and effect exists
There isn’t room
theres plenty
What room is there?
The laws of the universe aren’t loose
They can’t be broken on our level
its very tight
to the point we are only able to break the "laws of physics" at the subatomic level
I don’t think that restricts free will
thats two completely different topics
one is philosphy one is physics
free will in the physical sense cant exist because nothing can exist without influencing factors
ok, lemme ask you a question. if a man with no moral experience for whatever reason was given a piece of paper. that had one question with four different answers about a moral question. which one would he chose?
>if a man with no moral experience
its an important thought question
how is it important?
just try your best to answer it
its not a realistic question so it serves no realistic purpose
it doesnt have to be, its a thought question
so philosophy
whatever floats your boat
well it is statistically a 55% chance the correct option is"C"
if morals are arbitrary, then there is no right answer, he answers it as he sees it
He wouldn’t answer it
That’s what happens in a vacuum
ok for that to have validity you have to now find a man with no moral experiemce
i can rephrase the question to be more realistic
If there is no cause there will be no effect
the thought exercize itself is worthless as we have intrinsic values
we can only have intrinsic values if we have an outside entity to give us those
not true
instincts
if its food hed try to save it