Message from @Rex Colt
Discord ID: 456677015085645826
somehow i DO believe those drugs i took "took me to that hell"
and I wasnt "human" in that realm
Hence the subjectivity of trusting statistics.
like what i say is very controversal
Your position is that statistics CAN be unreliable ergo any field that relies on statistics is pseudoscience? What?
some say is new age
You make no sense.
but... when i talked to others who HAD THE SAME SHIT
at the SAME TIME
somethings up
No?
It's not that statistics can be unreliable, it's that reliability comes from personal judgment. This has nothing to do with the pseudoscience claim.
like? I am a believer in metaphyscal realms outside ours.
Can you tell me by what standards statistics are regarded as reliable or not?
thats why i'm not an atheist
Please go by them, one by one, and tell me how they are subjective.
Statistics more than anything else are raw data.
whos to say those biblical figures
werent fucking crazy people seeing weird shit
theres 2 types of people in this world
like sometimes i wonder if all those bugmen who line up... to see superhero movies and obsess on leftism
Actually have free will
or are controlled by the same collectivist eitity
they all group think look the same talk the same like the same shit
They're raw data, right, but how that data is acquired is where that judgment comes from. There might be factors which skew the data in the first place, like if the statistics come from a study cataloging the efficacy of an experiment and there is an inaccuracy or error at some point that wasn't noticed by the people running it.
That does not in any way imply subjectivity.
Statistics-gathering techniques are not perfect. But again, not 'subjective'.
>There being an aspect of judgment of reliability does not imply subjectivity.
And statisticians refine and analyze statistics. It's not their job to collect faulty statistics you know.
And throwing it all out based on it being imperfect? Ridiculous.
And further basing that to say psychology is pseudoscience? Smallbrain! 😦
El Chepo reminds me of a guy I met named Homer in another NS group I was in hahahahahaha
I even notice... "similarities" and "patterns" more than most people.
even among the "alt right and new right"
Theres "archtypes"
Some people will have similar voices looks, mannerisms ect.
You're not nearly as profound as you think you are.
Personality types...
Nah man I just... notice fucking patterns.
Humans tend to do that. It's widely acknowledged.