Message from @Rex Colt

Discord ID: 456677015085645826


2018-06-14 04:28:08 UTC  

somehow i DO believe those drugs i took "took me to that hell"

2018-06-14 04:28:14 UTC  

and I wasnt "human" in that realm

2018-06-14 04:28:17 UTC  

Hence the subjectivity of trusting statistics.

2018-06-14 04:28:32 UTC  

like what i say is very controversal

2018-06-14 04:28:33 UTC  

Your position is that statistics CAN be unreliable ergo any field that relies on statistics is pseudoscience? What?

2018-06-14 04:28:36 UTC  

some say is new age

2018-06-14 04:28:37 UTC  

You make no sense.

2018-06-14 04:28:52 UTC  

but... when i talked to others who HAD THE SAME SHIT

2018-06-14 04:28:55 UTC  

at the SAME TIME

2018-06-14 04:28:57 UTC  

somethings up

2018-06-14 04:28:58 UTC  

No?

2018-06-14 04:29:39 UTC  

It's not that statistics can be unreliable, it's that reliability comes from personal judgment. This has nothing to do with the pseudoscience claim.

2018-06-14 04:29:46 UTC  

like? I am a believer in metaphyscal realms outside ours.

2018-06-14 04:29:55 UTC  

Can you tell me by what standards statistics are regarded as reliable or not?

2018-06-14 04:29:58 UTC  

thats why i'm not an atheist

2018-06-14 04:30:09 UTC  

Please go by them, one by one, and tell me how they are subjective.

2018-06-14 04:30:16 UTC  

Statistics more than anything else are raw data.

2018-06-14 04:31:01 UTC  

whos to say those biblical figures

2018-06-14 04:31:08 UTC  

werent fucking crazy people seeing weird shit

2018-06-14 04:31:21 UTC  

theres 2 types of people in this world

2018-06-14 04:31:25 UTC  

preoles and herders

2018-06-14 04:32:01 UTC  

like sometimes i wonder if all those bugmen who line up... to see superhero movies and obsess on leftism

2018-06-14 04:32:07 UTC  

Actually have free will

2018-06-14 04:32:15 UTC  

or are controlled by the same collectivist eitity

2018-06-14 04:32:49 UTC  

they all group think look the same talk the same like the same shit

2018-06-14 04:32:51 UTC  

They're raw data, right, but how that data is acquired is where that judgment comes from. There might be factors which skew the data in the first place, like if the statistics come from a study cataloging the efficacy of an experiment and there is an inaccuracy or error at some point that wasn't noticed by the people running it.

2018-06-14 04:33:19 UTC  

That does not in any way imply subjectivity.

2018-06-14 04:33:38 UTC  

Statistics-gathering techniques are not perfect. But again, not 'subjective'.

2018-06-14 04:33:54 UTC  

>There being an aspect of judgment of reliability does not imply subjectivity.

2018-06-14 04:33:57 UTC  

And statisticians refine and analyze statistics. It's not their job to collect faulty statistics you know.

2018-06-14 04:34:08 UTC  

And throwing it all out based on it being imperfect? Ridiculous.

2018-06-14 04:34:22 UTC  

And further basing that to say psychology is pseudoscience? Smallbrain! 😦

2018-06-14 04:34:29 UTC  

El Chepo reminds me of a guy I met named Homer in another NS group I was in hahahahahaha

2018-06-14 04:34:50 UTC  

I even notice... "similarities" and "patterns" more than most people.

2018-06-14 04:35:00 UTC  

even among the "alt right and new right"

2018-06-14 04:35:05 UTC  

Theres "archtypes"

2018-06-14 04:35:45 UTC  

Some people will have similar voices looks, mannerisms ect.

2018-06-14 04:35:50 UTC  

You're not nearly as profound as you think you are.

2018-06-14 04:35:51 UTC  

Personality types...

2018-06-14 04:36:04 UTC  

Nah man I just... notice fucking patterns.

2018-06-14 04:36:19 UTC  

Humans tend to do that. It's widely acknowledged.