Of course you can't,

THERE'S NO SUBJECTIVE/OBJECTIVE DISTINCTION IN ETHICS

that still dosen't mean you can't at least give some feasible answer.

?warn @Deleted User Rule 3

<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> ***ostentatiousotter#3068 has been warned.***

Useless mods are useless

HOW CAN I NOT BE IN A FIT OF RAGE WHEN EVERYONE IS DEFENDING TOTAL IGNORANCE

You just triggered the most intelligent and cultured man in Europe.

I need to read the rules again lmao

Do you have any idea what you've done?

What Zexy said

He has a PhD br0

They are literally saying it's okay to blissfully ignore that the entire FRAMEWORK OF THE QUESTION is INCORRECT and someone should STILL TRY TO ANSWER IT. NO NO NO NO NO NO

I personally believe that Otter here has perhaps interpreted the question in such a way that it's creating a paradox.

There's nothing to answer.

You can answer the question, there is always some way to answer a question.

It's very simple

Can't wait until otter reaches honored citizen

!rank @Deleted User

Even if considered incorrect, there's nothing that can disprove or prove that answer.

It's just there,

as a answer.

RELATIVISM in ethics typical refers to CULTURAL RELATIVISM

it has nothing to do with utilitarian premises

those ARE UNIVERSAL arguments based on A CONSEQUENTIAL premise

what irma wants to argue for is DEONTOLOGICAL ethics

@Deleted User if you want to emphasize something, use *italics*

Not CAPS

Every post a Ben Shapiro YouTube video title.

which she mislabeled as ***objective***

furthermore, there are many kinds of ***deontological*** arguments

so why did she single out ONE particular form of consequentialism?

Ben Shapiro sodomizes a homeless person with a broken glass bottle

yet she did not single out one particular kind of deontological argument?

all of your obserations are irreleant

the question is wrong on so many levels.

If you fags want a serious argument @Deleted User @εïз irma εïз go to <#452955229227319306> where rule 8 applies

I don't think Otter is capable.

I wouldn't want to humiliate him further.

You've just been utterly humilated