Message from @JogaFlame
Discord ID: 487120932956143617
called the phenomological
@[ϟϟ-Ostf] Kurt Daluegette what is that chief
this gave birth to many modern and latter contemporary epistemologies
@JogaFlame Antifa and SJW's are going to raid several discord servers soon
?warn @[ϟϟ-Ostf] Kurt Daluegette trying and failing to ping everyone
<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> ***ϟϟ <HalfDeadSkeletor> ϟϟ#1298 has been warned.***
Again?
no man
<:Monkas:459545654029713408>
@[ϟϟ-Ostf] Kurt Daluegette we know idiot
if they comin in here
Kant wanted to marry Rationalism and Empiricism
what we doin
I look forward to skullfucking Antifa bugmen. I'll think of @Deleted User while doing so.
because his argument for ETHICS is one based on RATIONAL perimeters
it's an AXIOMATIC argument
@JogaFlame staff are aware of the situation chill
oh ok
AND ALSO deontological one
@JogaFlame pretend to be a tankie server
it creates a UNIVERSAL AXIOM of morality
Kant doesn't claim this as objective
knowledge of morality is not a priori
WHICH would lead us down a whole 'nother rabbithole
but try to grasp these basics first.
Alright but why is the dichotomy between objective and subjective morality incorrect?
because morality is metaphysics
no serious philosopher makes claims for objective morality
he might appeal to G-d as the foundation for his deontological system
but the system is still metaphysics built on scripture (which has been done many times during the Scholastic period)
Yeah but that doesn't explain why there isn't a dichotomy between the subjective and objective bases of morality.
There absolutely is.
there is no such dichotomy
That's why everyone but you was able to grasp the question.
:(
that's because the internet spreads bad information
I like you better when you're being a turboautist.
the greatest philosophers of Christian ethics
never claimed "objective morality"
Perhaps hours of turboautism drained your fuel cells.